[Gluster-users] [Gluster-devel] Glusterfs meta data space consumption issue

[ABHISHEK PALIWAL]

yes it is ext4. but what is the impact of this.

On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 9:26 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri <
pkarampu at redhat.com> wrote:

> Yes
>
> On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 8:21 AM, ABHISHEK PALIWAL <abhishpaliwal at gmail.com
> > wrote:
>
>> Means the fs where this brick has been created?
>> On Apr 13, 2017 8:19 AM, "Pranith Kumar Karampuri" <pkarampu at redhat.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Is your backend filesystem ext4?
>>>
>>> On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 6:29 AM, ABHISHEK PALIWAL <
>>> abhishpaliwal at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> No,we are not using sharding
>>>> On Apr 12, 2017 7:29 PM, "Alessandro Briosi" <ab1 at metalit.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Il 12/04/2017 14:16, ABHISHEK PALIWAL ha scritto:
>>>>>
>>>>> I have did more investigation and find out that brick dir size is
>>>>> equivalent to gluster mount point but .glusterfs having too much difference
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> You are probably using sharding?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Buon lavoro.
>>>>> *Alessandro Briosi*
>>>>>
>>>>> *METAL.it Nord S.r.l.*
>>>>> Via Maioliche 57/C - 38068 Rovereto (TN)
>>>>> Tel.+39.0464.430130 - Fax +39.0464.437393
>>>>> www.metalit.com
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Gluster-users mailing list
>>>> Gluster-users at gluster.org
>>>> http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Pranith
>>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Pranith
>



-- 




Regards
Abhishek Paliwal
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20170413/7776cd1f/attachment.html>