[Gluster-users] Production cluster planning

[mabi]

Sorry the link is missing in my previous post:

https://groups.google.com/a/zfsonlinux.org/d/msg/zfs-discuss/OI5dchl7d_8/vLRMZgJGYUoJ









-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] Production cluster planning
Local Time: September 30, 2016 8:15 PM
UTC Time: September 30, 2016 6:15 PM
From: mabi at protonmail.ch
To: Gluster Users <gluster-users at gluster.org>
Gluster Users <gluster-users at gluster.org>

The data will not be in "any" state as you mention or please define what you mean by "any". In the worst case you will just loose 5 seconds of data that's all as far as I understand.

Here is another very interesting but long post regarding this topic. Basically it all boils down to this specific









-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] Production cluster planning
Local Time: September 30, 2016 12:41 PM
UTC Time: September 30, 2016 10:41 AM
From: lindsay.mathieson at gmail.com
To: mabi <mabi at protonmail.ch>, Gluster Users <gluster-users at gluster.org>

On 29/09/2016 4:32 AM, mabi wrote:
> hat's not correct. There is no risk of corruption using
> "sync=disabled". In the worst case you just end up with old data but
> no corruption. See the following comment from a master of ZFS (Aaron
> Toponce):
>
> https://pthree.org/2013/01/25/glusterfs-linked-list-topology/#comment-227906

Your missing what he said - *ZFS* will not be corrupted but the data
written could be in any state, in this case the gluster filesystem data
and meta data. To have one ndoe in a cluster out of sync with out the
cluster knowing would be very bad.

--
Lindsay Mathieson
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20160930/a7f5c7db/attachment.html>