[Gluster-users] File Size and Brick Size

[Krutika Dhananjay]

Worked fine for me actually.

# md5sum lastlog
ab7557d582484a068c3478e342069326  lastlog
# rsync -avH lastlog  /mnt/
sending incremental file list
lastlog

sent 364,001,522 bytes  received 35 bytes  48,533,540.93 bytes/sec
total size is 363,912,592  speedup is 1.00
# cd /mnt
# md5sum lastlog
ab7557d582484a068c3478e342069326  lastlog

-Krutika


On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 8:21 AM, Krutika Dhananjay <kdhananj at redhat.com>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> What version of gluster are you using?
> Also, could you share your volume configuration (`gluster volume info`)?
>
> -Krutika
>
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 6:58 AM, Ravishankar N <ravishankar at redhat.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On 09/28/2016 12:16 AM, ML Wong wrote:
>>
>> Hello Ravishankar,
>> Thanks for introducing the sharding feature to me.
>> It does seems to resolve the problem i was encountering earlier. But I
>> have 1 question, do we expect the checksum of the file to be different if i
>> copy from directory A to a shard-enabled volume?
>>
>>
>> No the checksums must match. Perhaps Krutika who works on Sharding
>> (CC'ed) can help you figure out why that isn't the case here.
>> -Ravi
>>
>>
>> [xxxxx at ip-172-31-1-72 ~]$ sudo sha1sum /var/tmp/oVirt-Live-4.0.4.iso
>> ea8472f6408163fa9a315d878c651a519fc3f438  /var/tmp/oVirt-Live-4.0.4.iso
>> [xxxxx at ip-172-31-1-72 ~]$ sudo rsync -avH /var/tmp/oVirt-Live-4.0.4.iso
>> /mnt/
>> sending incremental file list
>> oVirt-Live-4.0.4.iso
>>
>> sent 1373802342 bytes  received 31 bytes  30871963.44 bytes/sec
>> total size is 1373634560  speedup is 1.00
>> [xxxxx at ip-172-31-1-72 ~]$ sudo sha1sum /mnt/oVirt-Live-4.0.4.iso
>> 14e9064857b40face90c91750d79c4d8665b9cab  /mnt/oVirt-Live-4.0.4.iso
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 6:42 PM, Ravishankar N <ravishankar at redhat.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 09/27/2016 05:15 AM, ML Wong wrote:
>>>
>>> Have anyone in the list who has tried copying file which is bigger than
>>> the individual brick/replica size?
>>> Test Scenario:
>>> Distributed-Replicated volume, 2GB size, 2x2 = 4 bricks, 2 replicas
>>> Each replica has 1GB
>>>
>>> When i tried to copy file this volume, by both fuse, or nfs mount. i get
>>> I/O error.
>>> Filesystem                  Size  Used Avail Use% Mounted on
>>> /dev/mapper/vg0-brick1     1017M   33M  985M   4% /data/brick1
>>> /dev/mapper/vg0-brick2     1017M  109M  909M  11% /data/brick2
>>> lbre-cloud-dev1:/sharevol1  2.0G  141M  1.9G   7% /sharevol1
>>>
>>> [xxxxxx at cloud-dev1 ~]$ du -sh /var/tmp/ovirt-live-el7-3.6.2.iso
>>> 1.3G /var/tmp/ovirt-live-el7-3.6.2.iso
>>>
>>> [melvinw at lbre-cloud-dev1 ~]$ sudo cp /var/tmp/ovirt-live-el7-3.6.2.iso
>>> /sharevol1/
>>> cp: error writing ‘/sharevol1/ovirt-live-el7-3.6.2.iso’: Input/output
>>> error
>>> cp: failed to extend ‘/sharevol1/ovirt-live-el7-3.6.2.iso’:
>>> Input/output error
>>> cp: failed to close ‘/sharevol1/ovirt-live-el7-3.6.2.iso’: Input/output
>>> error
>>>
>>>
>>> Does the mount log give you more information? It it was a disk full
>>> issue, the error you would get is ENOSPC and not EIO. This looks like
>>> something else.
>>>
>>>
>>> I know, we have experts in this mailing list. And, i assume, this is a
>>> common situation where many Gluster users may have encountered.  The worry
>>> i have what if you have a big VM file sitting on top of Gluster volume ...?
>>>
>>> It is recommended to use sharding (http://blog.gluster.org/2015/
>>> 12/introducing-shard-translator/) for VM workloads to alleviate these
>>> kinds of issues.
>>> -Ravi
>>>
>>> Any insights will be much appreciated.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Gluster-users mailing listGluster-users at gluster.orghttp://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>>>
>>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20160928/04f4d545/attachment.html>