[Gluster-users] What application workloads are too slow for you on gluster?

[Gambit15]

No problems with web hosting here, including loads of busy Wordpress sites
& the like. However you need to tune your filesystems correctly.
In our case, we've got webserver VMs running on top of a Gluster layer with
the following configurations...

   - Swap either disabled or strictly minimised with *vm.swappiness=10*
   - All filesystems are mounted with *relatime*
   - All logging is exported to an external server
   - Memcache on each server
   - nginx reverse proxy cache (Squid & Varnish'd also do the job)
   - APC PHP cache

Joe's even written a page
<https://joejulian.name/blog/optimizing-web-performance-with-glusterfs/>
about optimisations.

In all, the filesystem is only touched when a user uploads a file.
Everything else pretty much runs in memory.

This problem isn't so much Gluster's fault, as people trying to use a
distributed filesystem/volume like a local disk.

On 24 September 2016 at 20:36, Pranith Kumar Karampuri <pkarampu at redhat.com>
wrote:

>
>
> On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 8:59 PM, Kevin Lemonnier <lemonnierk at ulrar.net>
> wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 07:48:53PM +0530, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
>> >    hi,
>> >    A A A A A  I want to get a sense of the kinds of applications you
>> tried
>> >    out on gluster but you had to find other alternatives because gluster
>> >    didn't perform well enough or the soultion would become too
>> expensive if
>> >    you move to all SSD kind of setup.
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Web Hosting is what comes to mind for me. Applications like prestashop,
>> wordpress,
>> some custom apps ... I know that I try to use DRBD as much as I can for
>> that since
>> GlusterFS makes the sites just way too slow to use, I tried both fuse and
>> NFS (not
>> ganesha since I'm on debian everytime though, don't know if that matters).
>> Using things like OPCache and moving the application's cache outside of
>> the volume
>> are helping a lot but that brings a whole loads of other problems you
>> can't always
>> deal with, so most of the time I just don't use gluster for that.
>>
>> Last time I really had to use gluster to host a web app I ended up
>> installing a VM
>> with a disk stored on glusterfs and configuring a simple NFS server, that
>> was way
>> faster than mounting a gluster volume directly on the web servers. At
>> least that
>> proves VM hosting works pretty well now though !
>>
>> Now I can't try tiering, unfortunatly I don't have the option of having
>> hardware for
>> that, but maybe that would indeed solve it if it makes looking up lots of
>> tiny files
>> quicker.
>>
>
> I guess website hosting could be small-file workload related? Tiering may
> not help here until we reduce network round trips. I was wondering if
> anyone has any write intensive workload that gluster couldn't keep up with
> and they had to move to SSDs to make sure gluster works fine with it.
>
>
>>
>> --
>> Kevin Lemonnier
>> PGP Fingerprint : 89A5 2283 04A0 E6E9 0111
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Gluster-users mailing list
>> Gluster-users at gluster.org
>> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Pranith
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-users mailing list
> Gluster-users at gluster.org
> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20160926/ee919b9e/attachment.html>