[Gluster-users] 3.8.3 Bitrot signature process
Kotresh Hiremath Ravishankar
khiremat at redhat.com
Wed Sep 21 12:47:02 UTC 2016
Hi Amudhan,
If you see the ls output, some process has a fd opened in the backend.
That is the reason bitrot is not considering for the signing.
Could you please observe, after 120 secs of closure of "/media/disk2/brick2/.glusterfs/6e/7c/6e7c49e6-094e-4435-85bf-f21f99fd8764"
the signing happens. If so we need to figure out who holds this fd for such a long time.
And also we need to figure is this issue specific to EC volume.
Thanks and Regards,
Kotresh H R
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Amudhan P" <amudhan83 at gmail.com>
> To: "Kotresh Hiremath Ravishankar" <khiremat at redhat.com>
> Cc: "Gluster Users" <gluster-users at gluster.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2016 4:56:40 PM
> Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] 3.8.3 Bitrot signature process
>
> Hi Kotresh,
>
>
> Writing new file.
>
> getfattr -m. -e hex -d /media/disk2/brick2/data/G/test58-bs10M-c100.nul
> getfattr: Removing leading '/' from absolute path names
> # file: media/disk2/brick2/data/G/test58-bs10M-c100.nul
> trusted.bit-rot.version=0x020000000000000057da8b23000b120e
> trusted.ec.config=0x0000080501000200
> trusted.ec.size=0x000000003e800000
> trusted.ec.version=0x0000000000001f400000000000001f40
> trusted.gfid=0x6e7c49e6094e443585bff21f99fd8764
>
>
> Running ls -l in brick 2 pid
>
> ls -l /proc/30162/fd
>
> lr-x------ 1 root root 64 Sep 21 16:22 59 ->
> /media/disk2/brick2/.glusterfs/quanrantine
> lrwx------ 1 root root 64 Sep 21 16:22 6 ->
> /var/lib/glusterd/vols/glsvol1/run/10.1.2.2-media-disk2-brick2.pid
> lr-x------ 1 root root 64 Sep 21 16:25 60 ->
> /media/disk2/brick2/.glusterfs/6e/7c/6e7c49e6-094e-4435-85bf-f21f99fd8764
> lr-x------ 1 root root 64 Sep 21 16:22 61 ->
> /media/disk2/brick2/.glusterfs/quanrantine
>
>
> find /media/disk2/ -samefile
> /media/disk2/brick2/.glusterfs/6e/7c/6e7c49e6-094e-4435-85bf-f21f99fd8764
> /media/disk2/brick2/.glusterfs/6e/7c/6e7c49e6-094e-4435-85bf-f21f99fd8764
> /media/disk2/brick2/data/G/test58-bs10M-c100.nul
>
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 3:28 PM, Kotresh Hiremath Ravishankar <
> khiremat at redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Amudhan,
> >
> > Don't grep for the filename, glusterfs maintains hardlink in .glusterfs
> > directory
> > for each file. Just check 'ls -l /proc/<respective brick pid>/fd' for any
> > fds opened
> > for a file in .glusterfs and check if it's the same file.
> >
> > Thanks and Regards,
> > Kotresh H R
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Amudhan P" <amudhan83 at gmail.com>
> > > To: "Kotresh Hiremath Ravishankar" <khiremat at redhat.com>
> > > Cc: "Gluster Users" <gluster-users at gluster.org>
> > > Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2016 1:33:10 PM
> > > Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] 3.8.3 Bitrot signature process
> > >
> > > Hi Kotresh,
> > >
> > > i have used below command to verify any open fd for file.
> > >
> > > "ls -l /proc/*/fd | grep filename".
> > >
> > > as soon as write completes there no open fd's, if there is any alternate
> > > option. please let me know will also try that.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Also, below is my scrub status in my test setup. number of skipped files
> > > slow reducing day by day. I think files are skipped due to bitrot
> > signature
> > > process is not completed yet.
> > >
> > > where can i see scrub skipped files?
> > >
> > >
> > > Volume name : glsvol1
> > >
> > > State of scrub: Active (Idle)
> > >
> > > Scrub impact: normal
> > >
> > > Scrub frequency: daily
> > >
> > > Bitrot error log location: /var/log/glusterfs/bitd.log
> > >
> > > Scrubber error log location: /var/log/glusterfs/scrub.log
> > >
> > >
> > > =========================================================
> > >
> > > Node: localhost
> > >
> > > Number of Scrubbed files: 1644
> > >
> > > Number of Skipped files: 1001
> > >
> > > Last completed scrub time: 2016-09-20 11:59:58
> > >
> > > Duration of last scrub (D:M:H:M:S): 0:0:39:26
> > >
> > > Error count: 0
> > >
> > >
> > > =========================================================
> > >
> > > Node: 10.1.2.3
> > >
> > > Number of Scrubbed files: 1644
> > >
> > > Number of Skipped files: 1001
> > >
> > > Last completed scrub time: 2016-09-20 10:50:00
> > >
> > > Duration of last scrub (D:M:H:M:S): 0:0:38:17
> > >
> > > Error count: 0
> > >
> > >
> > > =========================================================
> > >
> > > Node: 10.1.2.4
> > >
> > > Number of Scrubbed files: 981
> > >
> > > Number of Skipped files: 1664
> > >
> > > Last completed scrub time: 2016-09-20 12:38:01
> > >
> > > Duration of last scrub (D:M:H:M:S): 0:0:35:19
> > >
> > > Error count: 0
> > >
> > >
> > > =========================================================
> > >
> > > Node: 10.1.2.1
> > >
> > > Number of Scrubbed files: 1263
> > >
> > > Number of Skipped files: 1382
> > >
> > > Last completed scrub time: 2016-09-20 11:57:21
> > >
> > > Duration of last scrub (D:M:H:M:S): 0:0:37:17
> > >
> > > Error count: 0
> > >
> > >
> > > =========================================================
> > >
> > > Node: 10.1.2.2
> > >
> > > Number of Scrubbed files: 1644
> > >
> > > Number of Skipped files: 1001
> > >
> > > Last completed scrub time: 2016-09-20 11:59:25
> > >
> > > Duration of last scrub (D:M:H:M:S): 0:0:39:18
> > >
> > > Error count: 0
> > >
> > > =========================================================
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > > Amudhan
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 11:45 AM, Kotresh Hiremath Ravishankar <
> > > khiremat at redhat.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Amudhan,
> > > >
> > > > I don't think it's the limitation with read data from the brick.
> > > > To limit the usage of CPU, throttling is done using token bucket
> > > > algorithm. The log message showed is related to it. But even then
> > > > I think it should not take 12 minutes for check-sum calculation unless
> > > > there is an fd open (might be internal). Could you please cross verify
> > > > if there are any fd opened on that file by looking into /proc? I will
> > > > also test it out in the mean time and get back to you.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks and Regards,
> > > > Kotresh H R
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > From: "Amudhan P" <amudhan83 at gmail.com>
> > > > > To: "Kotresh Hiremath Ravishankar" <khiremat at redhat.com>
> > > > > Cc: "Gluster Users" <gluster-users at gluster.org>
> > > > > Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2016 3:19:28 PM
> > > > > Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] 3.8.3 Bitrot signature process
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi Kotresh,
> > > > >
> > > > > Please correct me if i am wrong, Once a file write completes and as
> > soon
> > > > as
> > > > > closes fds, bitrot waits for 120 seconds and starts hashing and
> > update
> > > > > signature for the file in brick.
> > > > >
> > > > > But, what i am feeling that bitrot takes too much of time to complete
> > > > > hashing.
> > > > >
> > > > > below is test result i would like to share.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > writing data in below path using dd :
> > > > >
> > > > > /mnt/gluster/data/G (mount point)
> > > > > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 10M Sep 20 12:19 test53-bs10M-c1.nul
> > > > > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 100M Sep 20 12:19 test54-bs10M-c10.nul
> > > > >
> > > > > No any other write or read process is going on.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Checking file data in one of the brick.
> > > > >
> > > > > -rw-r--r-- 2 root root 2.5M Sep 20 12:23 test53-bs10M-c1.nul
> > > > > -rw-r--r-- 2 root root 25M Sep 20 12:23 test54-bs10M-c10.nul
> > > > >
> > > > > file's stat and getfattr info from brick, after write process
> > completed.
> > > > >
> > > > > gfstst-node5:/media/disk2/brick2/data/G$ stat test53-bs10M-c1.nul
> > > > > File: ‘test53-bs10M-c1.nul’
> > > > > Size: 2621440 Blocks: 5120 IO Block: 4096 regular
> > file
> > > > > Device: 821h/2081d Inode: 536874168 Links: 2
> > > > > Access: (0644/-rw-r--r--) Uid: ( 0/ root) Gid: ( 0/
> > root)
> > > > > Access: 2016-09-20 12:23:28.798886647 +0530
> > > > > Modify: 2016-09-20 12:23:28.994886646 +0530
> > > > > Change: 2016-09-20 12:23:28.998886646 +0530
> > > > > Birth: -
> > > > >
> > > > > gfstst-node5:/media/disk2/brick2/data/G$ stat test54-bs10M-c10.nul
> > > > > File: ‘test54-bs10M-c10.nul’
> > > > > Size: 26214400 Blocks: 51200 IO Block: 4096 regular
> > file
> > > > > Device: 821h/2081d Inode: 536874169 Links: 2
> > > > > Access: (0644/-rw-r--r--) Uid: ( 0/ root) Gid: ( 0/
> > root)
> > > > > Access: 2016-09-20 12:23:42.902886624 +0530
> > > > > Modify: 2016-09-20 12:23:44.378886622 +0530
> > > > > Change: 2016-09-20 12:23:44.378886622 +0530
> > > > > Birth: -
> > > > >
> > > > > gfstst-node5:/media/disk2/brick2/data/G$ sudo getfattr -m. -e hex -d
> > > > > test53-bs10M-c1.nul
> > > > > # file: test53-bs10M-c1.nul
> > > > > trusted.bit-rot.version=0x020000000000000057daa7b50002e5b4
> > > > > trusted.ec.config=0x0000080501000200
> > > > > trusted.ec.size=0x0000000000a00000
> > > > > trusted.ec.version=0x00000000000000500000000000000050
> > > > > trusted.gfid=0xe2416bd1aae4403c88f44286273bbe99
> > > > >
> > > > > gfstst-node5:/media/disk2/brick2/data/G$ sudo getfattr -m. -e hex -d
> > > > > test54-bs10M-c10.nul
> > > > > # file: test54-bs10M-c10.nul
> > > > > trusted.bit-rot.version=0x020000000000000057daa7b50002e5b4
> > > > > trusted.ec.config=0x0000080501000200
> > > > > trusted.ec.size=0x0000000006400000
> > > > > trusted.ec.version=0x00000000000003200000000000000320
> > > > > trusted.gfid=0x54e018dd8c5a4bd79e0317729d8a57c5
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > file's stat and getfattr info from brick, after bitrot signature
> > updated.
> > > > >
> > > > > gfstst-node5:/media/disk2/brick2/data/G$ stat test53-bs10M-c1.nul
> > > > > File: ‘test53-bs10M-c1.nul’
> > > > > Size: 2621440 Blocks: 5120 IO Block: 4096 regular
> > file
> > > > > Device: 821h/2081d Inode: 536874168 Links: 2
> > > > > Access: (0644/-rw-r--r--) Uid: ( 0/ root) Gid: ( 0/
> > root)
> > > > > Access: 2016-09-20 12:25:31.494886450 +0530
> > > > > Modify: 2016-09-20 12:23:28.994886646 +0530
> > > > > Change: 2016-09-20 12:27:00.994886307 +0530
> > > > > Birth: -
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > gfstst-node5:/media/disk2/brick2/data/G$ sudo getfattr -m. -e hex -d
> > > > > test53-bs10M-c1.nul
> > > > > # file: test53-bs10M-c1.nul
> > > > > trusted.bit-rot.signature=0x0102000000000000006de7493c5c
> > > > 90f643357c268fbaaf461c1567e0334e4948023ce17268403aa37a
> > > > > trusted.bit-rot.version=0x020000000000000057daa7b50002e5b4
> > > > > trusted.ec.config=0x0000080501000200
> > > > > trusted.ec.size=0x0000000000a00000
> > > > > trusted.ec.version=0x00000000000000500000000000000050
> > > > > trusted.gfid=0xe2416bd1aae4403c88f44286273bbe99
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > gfstst-node5:/media/disk2/brick2/data/G$ stat test54-bs10M-c10.nul
> > > > > File: ‘test54-bs10M-c10.nul’
> > > > > Size: 26214400 Blocks: 51200 IO Block: 4096 regular
> > file
> > > > > Device: 821h/2081d Inode: 536874169 Links: 2
> > > > > Access: (0644/-rw-r--r--) Uid: ( 0/ root) Gid: ( 0/
> > root)
> > > > > Access: 2016-09-20 12:25:47.510886425 +0530
> > > > > Modify: 2016-09-20 12:23:44.378886622 +0530
> > > > > Change: 2016-09-20 12:38:05.954885243 +0530
> > > > > Birth: -
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > gfstst-node5:/media/disk2/brick2/data/G$ sudo getfattr -m. -e hex -d
> > > > > test54-bs10M-c10.nul
> > > > > # file: test54-bs10M-c10.nul
> > > > > trusted.bit-rot.signature=0x010200000000000000394c345f0b
> > > > 0c63ee652627a62eed069244d35c4d5134e4f07d4eabb51afda47e
> > > > > trusted.bit-rot.version=0x020000000000000057daa7b50002e5b4
> > > > > trusted.ec.config=0x0000080501000200
> > > > > trusted.ec.size=0x0000000006400000
> > > > > trusted.ec.version=0x00000000000003200000000000000320
> > > > > trusted.gfid=0x54e018dd8c5a4bd79e0317729d8a57c5
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > (Actual time taken for reading file from brick for md5sum)
> > > > >
> > > > > gfstst-node5:/media/disk2/brick2/data/G$ time md5sum
> > test53-bs10M-c1.nul
> > > > > 8354dcaa18a1ecb52d0895bf00888c44 test53-bs10M-c1.nul
> > > > >
> > > > > real 0m0.045s
> > > > > user 0m0.007s
> > > > > sys 0m0.003s
> > > > >
> > > > > gfstst-node5:/media/disk2/brick2/data/G$ time md5sum
> > > > test54-bs10M-c10.nul
> > > > > bed3c0a4a1407f584989b4009e9ce33f test54-bs10M-c10.nul
> > > > >
> > > > > real 0m0.166s
> > > > > user 0m0.062s
> > > > > sys 0m0.011s
> > > > >
> > > > > As you can see that 'test54-bs10M-c10.nul' file took around 12
> > minutes to
> > > > > update bitort signature (pls refer stat output for the file).
> > > > >
> > > > > what would be the cause for such a slow read?. Any limitation in read
> > > > data
> > > > > from brick?
> > > > >
> > > > > Also, i am seeing this line bitd.log, what does this mean?
> > > > > [bit-rot.c:1784:br_rate_limit_signer] 0-glsvol1-bit-rot-0: [Rate
> > Limit
> > > > > Info] "tokens/sec (rate): 131072, maxlimit: 524288
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks
> > > > > Amudhan P
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 1:00 PM, Kotresh Hiremath Ravishankar <
> > > > > khiremat at redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi Amudhan,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks for testing out the bitrot feature and sorry for the delayed
> > > > > > response.
> > > > > > Please find the answers inline.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks and Regards,
> > > > > > Kotresh H R
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > > > From: "Amudhan P" <amudhan83 at gmail.com>
> > > > > > > To: "Gluster Users" <gluster-users at gluster.org>
> > > > > > > Sent: Friday, September 16, 2016 4:14:10 PM
> > > > > > > Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] 3.8.3 Bitrot signature process
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Can anyone reply to this mail.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 12:49 PM, Amudhan P <
> > amudhan83 at gmail.com >
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I am testing bitrot feature in Gluster 3.8.3 with disperse EC
> > volume
> > > > 4+1.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > When i write single small file (< 10MB) after 2 seconds i can see
> > > > bitrot
> > > > > > > signature in bricks for the file, but when i write multiple files
> > > > with
> > > > > > > different size ( > 10MB) it takes long time (> 24hrs) to see
> > bitrot
> > > > > > > signature in all the files.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The default timeout for signing to happen is 120 seconds. So the
> > > > > > signing will happen
> > > > > > 120 secs after the last fd gets closed on that file. So if the
> > file
> > > > is
> > > > > > being written
> > > > > > continuously, it will not be signed until 120 secs after it's
> > last
> > > > fd is
> > > > > > closed.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > My questions are.
> > > > > > > 1. I have enabled scrub schedule as hourly and throttle as
> > normal,
> > > > does
> > > > > > this
> > > > > > > make any impact in delaying bitrot signature?
> > > > > > No.
> > > > > > > 2. other than "bitd.log" where else i can watch current status of
> > > > bitrot,
> > > > > > > like number of files added for signature and file status?
> > > > > > Signature will happen after 120 sec of last fd closure, as
> > said
> > > > above.
> > > > > > There is not status command which tracks the signature of the
> > > > files.
> > > > > > But there is bitrot status command which tracks the number of
> > > > files
> > > > > > scrubbed.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > #gluster vol bitrot <volname> scrub status
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > 3. where i can confirm that all the files in the brick are bitrot
> > > > signed?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > As said, signing information of all the files is not tracked.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > 4. is there any file read size limit in bitrot?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I didn't get. Could you please elaborate this ?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > 5. options for tuning bitrot for faster signing of files?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Bitrot feature is mainly to detect silent corruption
> > (bitflips) of
> > > > > > files due to long
> > > > > > term storage. Hence the default is 120 sec of last fd
> > closure, the
> > > > > > signing happens.
> > > > > > But there is a tune able which can change the default 120 sec
> > but
> > > > > > that's only for
> > > > > > testing purposes and we don't recommend it.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > gluster vol get master features.expiry-time
> > > > > >
> > > > > > For testing purposes, you can change this default and test.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks
> > > > > > > Amudhan
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > Gluster-users mailing list
> > > > > > > Gluster-users at gluster.org
> > > > > > > http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
More information about the Gluster-users
mailing list