[Gluster-users] glusterfs best usage / best storage type or model
romeo.r at gmail.com
Mon Mar 28 11:21:30 UTC 2016
thanks for an answer. but in the case of 37 8TB bricks the data won't be
available if one of servers fails anyway :) And it seems to me, that it
would be even bigger mess to undarstand, what files are up and what are
down with bricks.. Or am I missing something? Reading this one
And what would be the redundancy count in case of 37 8TB bricks? still 1?
2016-03-28 11:53 GMT+03:00 Joe Julian <joe at julianfamily.org>:
> You're "wasting" the same amount of space either way. Make 37 8TB bricks
> and use disperse.
> On March 28, 2016 10:33:52 AM GMT+02:00, Roman <romeo.r at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Thanks for an option, but it seems that it is not that good in our
>> situation. I can't waste storage space on bricks for disperse and disperse
>> volumes require having bricks of the same size. We will start with
>> distributed volume of uneven size at the beginning. As we are speaking of
>> archive server, it is not that critical, if some portion of data won't be
>> available for some time (maintenance time). Having like 22 disks per server
>> makes the proability of raid5 failure,when 2 or more disks will fail a bit
>> higher though, so I'll really have to decide something about it :)
>> 2016-03-28 1:35 GMT+03:00 Russell Purinton <russell.purinton at gmail.com>:
>>> You might get better results if you forget about using RAID all together
>>> For example, GlusterFS supports “disperse” volumes which act like
>>> RAID5/6. It has the advantage that you can maintain access to things even
>>> if a whole server goes down. If you are using local RAID for redundancy and
>>> that server goes offline you’ll be missing files.
>>> On Mar 27, 2016, at 6:29 PM, Roman <romeo.r at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Need an advice from heavy glusterfs users and may be devs..
>>> Going to give a try for glusterfs in new direction for me. All the time
>>> I was using GlusterFS as VM storage for KVM guests.
>>> Now going to use it as a main distributed storage archive for
>>> digitalized (scanned) books in one of libraries in Estonia.
>>> At the very start we are going to scan about 346 GB - 495 GB daily,
>>> which is about 7000 - 10 000 pages. 600 GB in the future. There are some
>>> smaller files per book: a small xml file and compressed pdf (while all the
>>> original files will be tiff). This data goes to production server and then
>>> we are going to archive it on our new glusterfs archive.
>>> At this moment, we've got 2 servers:
>>> one with 22x8TB 5400 RPM SATA HDD disks
>>> second with 15x8TB 5400 RPM SATA HDD disks
>>> We are planning to add remaining disks to the second server at the end
>>> of the year, being budget based institue is crap, I know. So it should be
>>> as easy as extend LVM volume and remount it.
>>> Both the servers will run raid5 or raid6, haven't decided yet, but as we
>>> need as much storage space as possibe per server, seems like it will be
>>> At this moment I'm planing to create just a single distributed storage
>>> over these two servers and mount them on the production server, so it could
>>> archive files there. So it would be like 168+112 = 280 TB storage pool. We
>>> are planing to extend this one anually, by adding HDDs to second server at
>>> the end of first year and then adding some storage by extending the ammount
>>> of servers, wich means, just adding the bricks to the distributed storage
>>> Any better solutions or possibilities ?
>>> Best regards,
>>> Gluster-users mailing list
>>> Gluster-users at gluster.org
>> Best regards,
>> Gluster-users mailing list
>> Gluster-users at gluster.org
> Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Gluster-users