[Gluster-users] Problem with glusterd locks on gluster 3.6.1

Atin Mukherjee amukherj at redhat.com
Fri Jun 17 07:05:56 UTC 2016



On 06/16/2016 06:17 PM, Atin Mukherjee wrote:
> 
> 
> On 06/16/2016 01:32 PM, B.K.Raghuram wrote:
>> Thanks a lot Atin,
>>
>> The problem is that we are using a forked version of 3.6.1 which has
>> been modified to work with ZFS (for snapshots) but we do not have the
>> resources to port that over to the later versions of gluster.
>>
>> Would you know of anyone who would be willing to take this on?!
> 
> If you can cherry pick the patches and apply them on your source and
> rebuild it, I can point the patches to you, but you'd need to give a
> day's time to me as I have some other items to finish from my plate.


Here is the list of the patches need to be applied on the following order:

http://review.gluster.org/9328
http://review.gluster.org/9393
http://review.gluster.org/10023

> 
> ~Atin
>>
>> Regards,
>> -Ram
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 11:02 AM, Atin Mukherjee <amukherj at redhat.com
>> <mailto:amukherj at redhat.com>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>     On 06/16/2016 10:49 AM, B.K.Raghuram wrote:
>>     >
>>     >
>>     > On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 5:01 PM, Atin Mukherjee <amukherj at redhat.com <mailto:amukherj at redhat.com>
>>     > <mailto:amukherj at redhat.com <mailto:amukherj at redhat.com>>> wrote:
>>     >
>>     >
>>     >
>>     >     On 06/15/2016 04:24 PM, B.K.Raghuram wrote:
>>     >     > Hi,
>>     >     >
>>     >     > We're using gluster 3.6.1 and we periodically find that gluster commands
>>     >     > fail saying the it could not get the lock on one of the brick machines.
>>     >     > The logs on that machine then say something like :
>>     >     >
>>     >     > [2016-06-15 08:17:03.076119] E
>>     >     > [glusterd-op-sm.c:3058:glusterd_op_ac_lock] 0-management: Unable to
>>     >     > acquire lock for vol2
>>     >
>>     >     This is a possible case if concurrent volume operations are run. Do you
>>     >     have any script which checks for volume status on an interval from all
>>     >     the nodes, if so then this is an expected behavior.
>>     >
>>     >
>>     > Yes, I do have a couple of scripts that check on volume and quota
>>     > status.. Given this, I do get a "Another transaction is in progress.."
>>     > message which is ok. The problem is that sometimes I get the volume lock
>>     > held message which never goes away. This sometimes results in glusterd
>>     > consuming a lot of memory and CPU and the problem can only be fixed with
>>     > a reboot. The log files are huge so I'm not sure if its ok to attach
>>     > them to an email.
>>
>>     Ok, so this is known. We have fixed lots of stale lock issues in 3.7
>>     branch and some of them if not all were also backported to 3.6 branch.
>>     The issue is you are using 3.6.1 which is quite old. If you can upgrade
>>     to latest versions of 3.7 or at worst of 3.6 I am confident that this
>>     will go away.
>>
>>     ~Atin
>>     >
>>     >     >
>>     >     > After sometime, glusterd then seems to give up and die..
>>     >
>>     >     Do you mean glusterd shuts down or segfaults, if so I am more
>>     interested
>>     >     in analyzing this part. Could you provide us the glusterd log,
>>     >     cmd_history log file along with core (in case of SEGV) from
>>     all the
>>     >     nodes for the further analysis?
>>     >
>>     >
>>     > There is no segfault. glusterd just shuts down. As I said above,
>>     > sometimes this happens and sometimes it just continues to hog a lot of
>>     > memory and CPU..
>>     >
>>     >
>>     >     >
>>     >     > Interestingly, I also find the following line in the
>>     beginning of
>>     >     > etc-glusterfs-glusterd.vol.log and I dont know if this has any
>>     >     > significance to the issue :
>>     >     >
>>     >     > [2016-06-14 06:48:57.282290] I
>>     >     > [glusterd-store.c:2063:glusterd_restore_op_version]
>>     0-management:
>>     >     > Detected new install. Setting op-version to maximum : 30600
>>     >     >
>>     >
>>     >
>>     > What does this line signify?
>>
>>


More information about the Gluster-users mailing list