[Gluster-users] Reduce informational logging

David Gossage dgossage at carouselchecks.com
Thu Jul 14 09:07:20 UTC 2016


On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 3:33 AM, Manikandan Selvaganesh <mselvaga at redhat.com
> wrote:

> Hi David,
>
> Which version are you using. Though the error seems superfluous, do you
> observe any functional failures.
>

3.7.11 and no so far I have noticed no issues over past week as I have been
enabling sharding on storage.  VM's all seem to be running just fine.  Been
migrating disk images off and on to shard a few a night since Sunday and
all have been behaving as expected.

>
> Also, there are quite some EINVAL bugs we fixed in 3.8, could you point out
> to the one you find matching.
>

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1325810

This is one I found while searching a portion of my error message.


> On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 1:51 PM, David Gossage <
> dgossage at carouselchecks.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 11:02 PM, Atin Mukherjee <amukherj at redhat.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 8:02 AM, David Gossage <
>>> dgossage at carouselchecks.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> M, David Gossage <dgossage at carouselchecks.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Is their a way to reduce logging of informational spam?
>>>>>
>>>>> /var/log/glusterfs/bricks/gluster1-BRICK1-1.log is now 3GB over past
>>>>> few days
>>>>>
>>>>> [2016-07-14 00:54:35.267018] I [dict.c:473:dict_get]
>>>>> (-->/lib64/libglusterfs.so.0(default_getxattr_cbk+0xac) [0x7fcdc396dcbc]
>>>>> -->/usr/lib64/glusterfs/3.7.11/xlator/features/marker.so(marker_getxattr_cbk+0xa7)
>>>>> [0x7fcdafde5917] -->/lib64/libglusterfs.so.0(dict_get+0xac)
>>>>> [0x7fcdc395e0fc] ) 0-dict: !this || key=() [Invalid argument]
>>>>> [2016-07-14 00:54:35.272945] I [dict.c:473:dict_get]
>>>>> (-->/lib64/libglusterfs.so.0(default_getxattr_cbk+0xac) [0x7fcdc396dcbc]
>>>>> -->/usr/lib64/glusterfs/3.7.11/xlator/features/marker.so(marker_getxattr_cbk+0xa7)
>>>>> [0x7fcdafde5917] -->/lib64/libglusterfs.so.0(dict_get+0xac)
>>>>> [0x7fcdc395e0fc] ) 0-dict: !this || key=() [Invalid argument]
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> @Mani, Is this something which get logged in a normal scenario? I doubt.
>>>
>>>
>> I did find a bug report about it presumably being fixed in 3.8.
>>
>> I also currently have a node down which may be triggering them.
>>
>>
>>>>>
>>>> Believe I found it
>>>>
>>>>  gluster volume set testvol diagnostics.brick-log-level WARNING
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Storage/3/html/Administration_Guide/Configuring_the_Log_Level.html
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *David Gossage*
>>>>> *Carousel Checks Inc. | System Administrator*
>>>>> *Office* 708.613.2284
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Gluster-users mailing list
>>>> Gluster-users at gluster.org
>>>> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> --Atin
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Manikandan Selvaganesh.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20160714/430eaf11/attachment.html>


More information about the Gluster-users mailing list