[Gluster-users] 3.8 Plan changes - proposal

[Bishoy Mikhael]

So what about IPv6?!

Bishoy

On Tuesday, January 19, 2016, Vijay Bellur <vbellur at redhat.com> wrote:

> On 01/11/2016 04:22 PM, Vijay Bellur wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> We discussed the following proposal for 3.8 in the maintainers mailing
>> list and there was general consensus about the changes being a step in
>> the right direction. Would like to hear your thoughts about the same.
>>
>> Changes to 3.8 Plan:
>> --------------------
>>
>> 1. Include 4.0 features such as NSR, dht2, glusterd2.0 & eventing as
>> experimental features in 3.8. 4.0 features are shaping up reasonably
>> well and it would be nice to have them packaged in 3.8 so that we can
>> get more meaningful feedback early on. As 4.0 features mature, we can
>> push them out through subsequent 3.8.x releases to derive iterative
>> feedback.
>>
>> 2. Ensure that most of our components have tests in distaf by 3.8. I
>> would like us to have more deterministic pre-release testing for 3.8 and
>> having tests in distaf should help us in accomplishing that goal.
>>
>> 3. Add "forward compatibility" section to all feature pages proposed for
>> 3.8 so that we carefully review the impact of a feature on all upcoming
>> Gluster.next features.
>>
>> 4. Have Niels de Vos as the maintainer for 3.8 with immediate effect.
>> This is a change from the past where we have had release maintainers
>> after a .0 release is in place. I think Niels' diligence as a release
>> manager will help us in having a more polished .0 release.
>>
>> 5. Move out 3.8 by 2-3 months (end of May or early June 2016) to
>> accomplish these changes.
>>
>> Appreciate your feedback about this proposal!
>>
>>
> Since we have not come across any objections to this proposal, let us go
> ahead and turn this into our plan of action.
>
> Look forward to an exciting first release of Gluster.next!
>
> Cheers,
> Vijay
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-users mailing list
> Gluster-users at gluster.org
> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20160119/26d512a9/attachment.html>