[Gluster-users] Gluster 3.7.6 add new node state Peer Rejected (Connected)
Rafi Kavungal Chundattu Parambil
rkavunga at redhat.com
Mon Feb 29 20:12:52 UTC 2016
You have to figure out the difference in volinfo in the peers . and rectify it. Or simply you can reduce version in vol info by one in node3 and restating the glusterd will solve the problem.
But I would be more interested to figure out why glusterd crashed.
1) Can you paste back trace of the core generated.
2) Can you paste the op-version for all the nodes.
3) Can you mention steps you did that lead to crash? Seems like you added a brick .
4) If possible can you recollect the order in which you added the peers and the version. Also the upgrade sequence.
May be you can race a bug in bugzilla with the information.
Regards
Rafi KC
On 1 Mar 2016 12:58 am, Steve Dainard <sdainard at spd1.com> wrote:
I changed quota-version=1 on the two new nodes, and was able to join the cluster. I also rebooted the two new nodes and everything came up correctly.
Then I triggered a rebalance fix-layout and one of the original cluster members (node gluster03) glusterd crashed. I restarted glusterd and was connected but after a few minutes I'm left with:
# gluster peer status
Number of Peers: 5
Hostname: 10.0.231.51
Uuid: b01de59a-4428-486b-af49-cb486ab44a07
State: Peer in Cluster (Connected)
Hostname: 10.0.231.52
Uuid: 75143760-52a3-4583-82bb-a9920b283dac
State: Peer Rejected (Connected)
Hostname: 10.0.231.53
Uuid: 2c0b8bb6-825a-4ddd-9958-d8b46e9a2411
State: Peer in Cluster (Connected)
Hostname: 10.0.231.54
Uuid: 408d88d6-0448-41e8-94a3-bf9f98255d9c
State: Peer in Cluster (Connected)
Hostname: 10.0.231.55
Uuid: 9c155c8e-2cd1-4cfc-83af-47129b582fd3
State: Peer in Cluster (Connected)
I see in the logs (attached) there is now a cksum error:
[2016-02-29 19:16:42.082256] E [MSGID: 106010] [glusterd-utils.c:2717:glusterd_compare_friend_volume] 0-management: Version of Cksums storage differ. local cksum = 50348222, remote cksum = 50348735 on peer 10.0.231.55
[2016-02-29 19:16:42.082298] I [MSGID: 106493] [glusterd-handler.c:3780:glusterd_xfer_friend_add_resp] 0-glusterd: Responded to 10.0.231.55 (0), ret: 0
[2016-02-29 19:16:42.092535] I [MSGID: 106493] [glusterd-rpc-ops.c:480:__glusterd_friend_add_cbk] 0-glusterd: Received RJT from uuid: 2c0b8bb6-825a-4ddd-9958-d8b46e9a2411, host: 10.0.231.53, port: 0
[2016-02-29 19:16:42.096036] I [MSGID: 106143] [glusterd-pmap.c:229:pmap_registry_bind] 0-pmap: adding brick /mnt/lv-export-domain-storage/export-domain-storage on port 49153
[2016-02-29 19:16:42.097296] I [MSGID: 106143] [glusterd-pmap.c:229:pmap_registry_bind] 0-pmap: adding brick /mnt/lv-vm-storage/vm-storage on port 49155
[2016-02-29 19:16:42.100727] I [MSGID: 106163] [glusterd-handshake.c:1193:__glusterd_mgmt_hndsk_versions_ack] 0-management: using the op-version 30700
[2016-02-29 19:16:42.108495] I [MSGID: 106490] [glusterd-handler.c:2539:__glusterd_handle_incoming_friend_req] 0-glusterd: Received probe from uuid: 2c0b8bb6-825a-4ddd-9958-d8b46e9a2411
[2016-02-29 19:16:42.109295] E [MSGID: 106010] [glusterd-utils.c:2717:glusterd_compare_friend_volume] 0-management: Version of Cksums storage differ. local cksum = 50348222, remote cksum = 50348735 on peer 10.0.231.53
[2016-02-29 19:16:42.109338] I [MSGID: 106493] [glusterd-handler.c:3780:glusterd_xfer_friend_add_resp] 0-glusterd: Responded to 10.0.231.53 (0), ret: 0
[2016-02-29 19:16:42.119521] I [MSGID: 106143] [glusterd-pmap.c:229:pmap_registry_bind] 0-pmap: adding brick /mnt/lv-env-modules/env-modules on port 49157
[2016-02-29 19:16:42.122856] I [MSGID: 106143] [glusterd-pmap.c:229:pmap_registry_bind] 0-pmap: adding brick /mnt/raid6-storage/storage on port 49156
[2016-02-29 19:16:42.508104] I [MSGID: 106493] [glusterd-rpc-ops.c:480:__glusterd_friend_add_cbk] 0-glusterd: Received RJT from uuid: b01de59a-4428-486b-af49-cb486ab44a07, host: 10.0.231.51, port: 0
[2016-02-29 19:16:42.519403] I [MSGID: 106163] [glusterd-handshake.c:1193:__glusterd_mgmt_hndsk_versions_ack] 0-management: using the op-version 30700
[2016-02-29 19:16:42.524353] I [MSGID: 106490] [glusterd-handler.c:2539:__glusterd_handle_incoming_friend_req] 0-glusterd: Received probe from uuid: b01de59a-4428-486b-af49-cb486ab44a07
[2016-02-29 19:16:42.524999] E [MSGID: 106010] [glusterd-utils.c:2717:glusterd_compare_friend_volume] 0-management: Version of Cksums storage differ. local cksum = 50348222, remote cksum = 50348735 on peer 10.0.231.51
[2016-02-29 19:16:42.525038] I [MSGID: 106493] [glusterd-handler.c:3780:glusterd_xfer_friend_add_resp] 0-glusterd: Responded to 10.0.231.51 (0), ret: 0
[2016-02-29 19:16:42.592523] I [MSGID: 106493] [glusterd-rpc-ops.c:480:__glusterd_friend_add_cbk] 0-glusterd: Received RJT from uuid: 408d88d6-0448-41e8-94a3-bf9f98255d9c, host: 10.0.231.54, port: 0
[2016-02-29 19:16:42.599518] I [MSGID: 106163] [glusterd-handshake.c:1193:__glusterd_mgmt_hndsk_versions_ack] 0-management: using the op-version 30700
[2016-02-29 19:16:42.604821] I [MSGID: 106490] [glusterd-handler.c:2539:__glusterd_handle_incoming_friend_req] 0-glusterd: Received probe from uuid: 408d88d6-0448-41e8-94a3-bf9f98255d9c
[2016-02-29 19:16:42.605458] E [MSGID: 106010] [glusterd-utils.c:2717:glusterd_compare_friend_volume] 0-management: Version of Cksums storage differ. local cksum = 50348222, remote cksum = 50348735 on peer 10.0.231.54
[2016-02-29 19:16:42.605492] I [MSGID: 106493] [glusterd-handler.c:3780:glusterd_xfer_friend_add_resp] 0-glusterd: Responded to 10.0.231.54 (0), ret: 0
[2016-02-29 19:16:42.621943] I [MSGID: 106163] [glusterd-handshake.c:1193:__glusterd_mgmt_hndsk_versions_ack] 0-management: using the op-version 30700
[2016-02-29 19:16:42.628443] I [MSGID: 106490] [glusterd-handler.c:2539:__glusterd_handle_incoming_friend_req] 0-glusterd: Received probe from uuid: a965e782-39e2-41cc-a0d1-b32ecccdcd2f
[2016-02-29 19:16:42.629079] E [MSGID: 106010] [glusterd-utils.c:2717:glusterd_compare_friend_volume] 0-management: Version of Cksums storage differ. local cksum = 50348222, remote cksum = 50348735 on peer 10.0.231.50
On gluster01/02/04/05
/var/lib/glusterd/vols/storage/cksum info=998305000
On gluster03
/var/lib/glusterd/vols/storage/cksum info=998305001
How do I recover from this? Can I just stop glusterd on gluster03 and change the cksum value?
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 12:49 PM, Mohammed Rafi K C <rkavunga at redhat.com> wrote:
On 02/26/2016 01:53 AM, Mohammed Rafi K C wrote:
On 02/26/2016 01:32 AM, Steve Dainard wrote:
I haven't done anything more than peer thus far, so I'm a bit confused as to how the volume info fits in, can you expand on this a bit?
Failed commits? Is this split brain on the replica volumes? I don't get any return from 'gluster volume heal <volname> info' on all the replica volumes, but if I try a gluster volume heal <volname> full I get: 'Launching heal operation to perform full self heal on volume <volname> has been unsuccessful'.
forget about this. it is not for metadata selfheal .
I have 5 volumes total.
'Replica 3' volumes running on gluster01/02/03:
vm-storage
iso-storage
export-domain-storage
env-modules
And one distributed only volume 'storage' info shown below:
From existing host gluster01/02:
type=0
count=4
status=1
sub_count=0
stripe_count=1
replica_count=1
disperse_count=0
redundancy_count=0
version=25
transport-type=0
volume-id=26d355cb-c486-481f-ac16-e25390e73775
username=eb9e2063-6ba8-4d16-a54f-2c7cf7740c4c
password=
op-version=3
client-op-version=3
quota-version=1
parent_volname=N/A
restored_from_snap=00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000
snap-max-hard-limit=256
features.quota-deem-statfs=on
features.inode-quota=on
diagnostics.brick-log-level=WARNING
features.quota=on
performance.readdir-ahead=on
performance.cache-size=1GB
performance.stat-prefetch=on
brick-0=10.0.231.50:-mnt-raid6-storage-storage
brick-1=10.0.231.51:-mnt-raid6-storage-storage
brick-2=10.0.231.52:-mnt-raid6-storage-storage
brick-3=10.0.231.53:-mnt-raid6-storage-storage
From existing host gluster03/04:
type=0
count=4
status=1
sub_count=0
stripe_count=1
replica_count=1
disperse_count=0
redundancy_count=0
version=25
transport-type=0
volume-id=26d355cb-c486-481f-ac16-e25390e73775
username=eb9e2063-6ba8-4d16-a54f-2c7cf7740c4c
password=
op-version=3
client-op-version=3
quota-version=1
parent_volname=N/A
restored_from_snap=00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000
snap-max-hard-limit=256
features.quota-deem-statfs=on
features.inode-quota=on
performance.stat-prefetch=on
performance.cache-size=1GB
performance.readdir-ahead=on
features.quota=on
diagnostics.brick-log-level=WARNING
brick-0=10.0.231.50:-mnt-raid6-storage-storage
brick-1=10.0.231.51:-mnt-raid6-storage-storage
brick-2=10.0.231.52:-mnt-raid6-storage-storage
brick-3=10.0.231.53:-mnt-raid6-storage-storage
So far between gluster01/02 and gluster03/04 the configs are the same, although the ordering is different for some of the features.
On gluster05/06 the ordering is different again, and the quota-version=0 instead of 1.
This is why the peer shows as rejected. Can you check the op-version of all the glusterd including the one which is in reject state. you can find out the op-version here in /var/lib/glusterd/glusterd.info
If all the op-version are same and 3.7.6, then to work-around the issue, you can manually make it quota-version=1, and restarting the glusterd will solve the problem, But I would strongly recommend you to figure out the RCA. May be you can file a bug for this.
Rafi
Rafi KC
From new hosts gluster05/gluster06:
type=0
count=4
status=1
sub_count=0
stripe_count=1
replica_count=1
disperse_count=0
redundancy_count=0
version=25
transport-type=0
volume-id=26d355cb-c486-481f-ac16-e25390e73775
username=eb9e2063-6ba8-4d16-a54f-2c7cf7740c4c
password=
op-version=3
client-op-version=3
quota-version=0
parent_volname=N/A
restored_from_snap=00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000
snap-max-hard-limit=256
performance.stat-prefetch=on
performance.cache-size=1GB
performance.readdir-ahead=on
features.quota=on
diagnostics.brick-log-level=WARNING
features.inode-quota=on
features.quota-deem-statfs=on
brick-0=10.0.231.50:-mnt-raid6-storage-storage
brick-1=10.0.231.51:-mnt-raid6-storage-storage
brick-2=10.0.231.52:-mnt-raid6-storage-storage
brick-3=10.0.231.53:-mnt-raid6-storage-storage
Also, I forgot to mention that when I initially peer'd the two new hosts, glusterd crashed on gluster03 and had to be restarted (log attached) but has been fine since.
Thanks,
Steve
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 11:27 AM, Mohammed Rafi K C <rkavunga at redhat.com> wrote:
On 02/25/2016 11:45 PM, Steve Dainard wrote:
Hello,
I upgraded from 3.6.6 to 3.7.6 a couple weeks ago. I just peered 2 new nodes to a 4 node cluster and gluster peer status is:
# gluster peer status <-- from node gluster01
Number of Peers: 5
Hostname: 10.0.231.51
Uuid: b01de59a-4428-486b-af49-cb486ab44a07
State: Peer in Cluster (Connected)
Hostname: 10.0.231.52
Uuid: 75143760-52a3-4583-82bb-a9920b283dac
State: Peer in Cluster (Connected)
Hostname: 10.0.231.53
Uuid: 2c0b8bb6-825a-4ddd-9958-d8b46e9a2411
State: Peer in Cluster (Connected)
Hostname: 10.0.231.54 <-- new node gluster05
Uuid: 408d88d6-0448-41e8-94a3-bf9f98255d9c
State: Peer Rejected (Connected)
Hostname: 10.0.231.55 <-- new node gluster06
Uuid: 9c155c8e-2cd1-4cfc-83af-47129b582fd3
State: Peer Rejected (Connected)
Looks like your configuration files are mismatching, ie the checksum calculation differs on this two node than the others,
Did you had any failed commit ?
Compare your /var/lib/glusterd/<volname>/info of the failed node against good one, mostly you could see some difference.
can you paste the /var/lib/glusterd/<volname>/info ?
Regards
Rafi KC
I followed the write-up here: http://www.gluster.org/community/documentation/index.php/Resolving_Peer_Rejected and the two new nodes peer'd properly but after a reboot of the two new nodes I'm seeing the same Peer Rejected (Connected) State.
I've attached logs from an existing node, and the two new nodes.
Thanks for any suggestions,
Steve
_______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users at gluster.org http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20160229/6414efff/attachment.html>
More information about the Gluster-users
mailing list