[Gluster-users] [Gluster-devel] GlusterFS v3.7.8 client leaks summary — part II

[Mathieu Chateau]

Hello,

when will these patch be included in gluster official version ?

I upgraded my client to 3.7.8, but still have big leak following rsync jobs

 PID USER      PR  NI    VIRT    RES    SHR S  %CPU %MEM     TIME+ COMMAND
 1570 root      20   0 7404740 *6.210g*   4108 S   0.0 *40.0* 106:24.02
glusterfs
 1573 root      20   0 3796044 2.924g   3580 S   0.0 18.8   7:07.05
glusterfs
 1571 root      20   0 2469924 1.695g   3588 S   0.0 10.9   1:19.75
glusterfs

thanks


Cordialement,
Mathieu CHATEAU
http://www.lotp.fr

2016-02-16 18:54 GMT+01:00 Soumya Koduri <skoduri at redhat.com>:

>
>
> On 02/16/2016 08:06 PM, Oleksandr Natalenko wrote:
>
>> Hmm, OK. I've rechecked 3.7.8 with the following patches (latest
>> revisions):
>>
>> ===
>> Soumya Koduri (3):
>>        gfapi: Use inode_forget in case of handle objects
>>        inode: Retire the inodes from the lru list in inode_table_destroy
>>        rpc: Fix for rpc_transport_t leak
>> ===
>>
>> Here is Valgrind output: [1]
>>
>> It seems that all leaks are gone, and that is very nice.
>>
>
> At least major chunk of leaks seem to have gone. Many thanks to you too
> for very detailed tests and analysis :)
>
> -Soumya
>
>
>
>> Many thanks to all devs.
>>
>> [1] https://gist.github.com/anonymous/eddfdaf3eb7bff458326
>>
>> 16.02.2016 15:30, Soumya Koduri wrote:
>>
>>> I have tested using your API app (I/Os done - create,write and stat).
>>> I still do not see any inode related leaks. However I posted another
>>> fix for rpc_transport object related leak [1].
>>>
>>> I request you to re-check if you have the latest patch of [2] applied
>>> in your build.
>>>
>>> [1] http://review.gluster.org/#/c/13456/
>>> [2] http://review.gluster.org/#/c/13125/
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-users mailing list
> Gluster-users at gluster.org
> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20160221/af7303d7/attachment.html>