[Gluster-users] 3.8.3 Shards Healing Glacier Slow

Krutika Dhananjay kdhananj at redhat.com
Mon Aug 29 10:25:04 UTC 2016


Could you attach both client and brick logs? Meanwhile I will try these
steps out on my machines and see if it is easily recreatable.

-Krutika

On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 2:31 PM, David Gossage <dgossage at carouselchecks.com>
wrote:

> Centos 7 Gluster 3.8.3
>
> Brick1: ccgl1.gl.local:/gluster1/BRICK1/1
> Brick2: ccgl2.gl.local:/gluster1/BRICK1/1
> Brick3: ccgl4.gl.local:/gluster1/BRICK1/1
> Options Reconfigured:
> cluster.data-self-heal-algorithm: full
> cluster.self-heal-daemon: on
> cluster.locking-scheme: granular
> features.shard-block-size: 64MB
> features.shard: on
> performance.readdir-ahead: on
> storage.owner-uid: 36
> storage.owner-gid: 36
> performance.quick-read: off
> performance.read-ahead: off
> performance.io-cache: off
> performance.stat-prefetch: on
> cluster.eager-lock: enable
> network.remote-dio: enable
> cluster.quorum-type: auto
> cluster.server-quorum-type: server
> server.allow-insecure: on
> cluster.self-heal-window-size: 1024
> cluster.background-self-heal-count: 16
> performance.strict-write-ordering: off
> nfs.disable: on
> nfs.addr-namelookup: off
> nfs.enable-ino32: off
> cluster.granular-entry-heal: on
>
> Friday did rolling upgrade from 3.8.3->3.8.3 no issues.
> Following steps detailed in previous recommendations began proces of
> replacing and healngbricks one node at a time.
>
> 1) kill pid of brick
> 2) reconfigure brick from raid6 to raid10
> 3) recreate directory of brick
> 4) gluster volume start <> force
> 5) gluster volume heal <> full
>
> 1st node worked as expected took 12 hours to heal 1TB data.  Load was
> little heavy but nothing shocking.
>
> About an hour after node 1 finished I began same process on node2.  Heal
> proces kicked in as before and the files in directories visible from mount
> and .glusterfs healed in short time.  Then it began crawl of .shard adding
> those files to heal count at which point the entire proces ground to a halt
> basically.  After 48 hours out of 19k shards it has added 5900 to heal
> list.  Load on all 3 machnes is negligible.   It was suggested to change
> this value to full cluster.data-self-heal-algorithm and restart volume
> which I did.  No efffect.  Tried relaunching heal no effect, despite any
> node picked.  I started each VM and performed a stat of all files from
> within it, or a full virus scan  and that seemed to cause short small
> spikes in shards added, but not by much.  Logs are showing no real messages
> indicating anything is going on.  I get hits to brick log on occasion of
> null lookups making me think its not really crawling shards directory but
> waiting for a shard lookup to add it.  I'll get following in brick log but
> not constant and sometime multiple for same shard.
>
> [2016-08-29 08:31:57.478125] W [MSGID: 115009]
> [server-resolve.c:569:server_resolve] 0-GLUSTER1-server: no resolution
> type for (null) (LOOKUP)
> [2016-08-29 08:31:57.478170] E [MSGID: 115050]
> [server-rpc-fops.c:156:server_lookup_cbk] 0-GLUSTER1-server: 12591783:
> LOOKUP (null) (00000000-0000-0000-00
> 00-000000000000/241a55ed-f0d5-4dbc-a6ce-ab784a0ba6ff.221) ==> (Invalid
> argument) [Invalid argument]
>
> This one repeated about 30 times in row then nothing for 10 minutes then
> one hit for one different shard by itself.
>
> How can I determine if Heal is actually running?  How can I kill it or
> force restart?  Does node I start it from determine which directory gets
> crawled to determine heals?
>
> *David Gossage*
> *Carousel Checks Inc. | System Administrator*
> *Office* 708.613.2284
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-users mailing list
> Gluster-users at gluster.org
> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20160829/42067b74/attachment.html>


More information about the Gluster-users mailing list