[Gluster-users] How accurate is heal statistics heal-count?
Lindsay Mathieson
lindsay.mathieson at gmail.com
Sun Apr 17 22:03:55 UTC 2016
On 18/04/2016 6:55 AM, Joe Julian wrote:
> All the steps necessary to marking something as needing healed are
> performed for every write (or metadata change). If you happen to check
> in the middle of that transaction, you'll see a heal pending.
Ok, have been off walking the dogs and had time to mediate on this.
Would it be accurate to summerise as this?
- statics heal-count shows the count of files *actually needing healing*
- heal info shows the list of files with uncommitted writes across the
bricks that would need heals *if* a node went down before the write was
committed.
* additionally it lists files being healed if a heal is in process
* writes can be data and metadata.
So its perfectly ok to see files being listed by heal info on a busy
cluster, so long as they aren't marked as a heal in progress.
thanks,
--
Lindsay Mathieson
More information about the Gluster-users
mailing list