[Gluster-users] FUSE incompatible on RHGS with centos/ubuntu open source clients?

[Atin Mukherjee]

This has to be a problem with op version, nothing else. Its just that 3.7.4
clients are running with higher op version because of which you are unable
to connect. Could you check the behaviour with 3.7.2/3.7.3?

-Atin
Sent from one plus one
On Sep 24, 2015 7:31 AM, "Gluster Admin" <gluster at hepcat.org> wrote:

> The RHS 3.1 gluster volume info:
>
> [root at rhgluster1 ~]# gluster volume info
>
> Volume Name: rhs_gluster
> Type: Distributed-Replicate
> Volume ID: ce5ebd81-35bf-40f6-bc53-04c494a8836f
> Status: Started
> Number of Bricks: 2 x 2 = 4
> Transport-type: tcp
> Bricks:
> Brick1: rhgluster1:/rhs/brick1
> Brick2: rhgluster2:/rhs/brick1
> Brick3: rhgluster3:/rhs/brick1
> Brick4: rhgluster4:/rhs/brick1
> Options Reconfigured:
> server.allow-insecure: off
> performance.readdir-ahead: on
> cluster.server-quorum-type: server
> cluster.quorum-type: auto
> cluster.server-quorum-ratio: 51%
>
> This is what I get on a centos client with 3.7.4 glusterfs fuse installed
> trying to mount a RHS Gluster 3.1 volume:
>
> [2015-09-24 01:57:31.742054] I [MSGID: 100030] [glusterfsd.c:2301:main]
> 0-/usr/sbin/glusterfs: Started running /usr/sbin/glusterfs version 3.7.4
> (args: /usr/sbin/glusterfs --volfile-server=rhgluster1
> --volfile-id=rhs_gluster /TEMP)
> [2015-09-24 01:57:31.755132] I [MSGID: 101190]
> [event-epoll.c:632:event_dispatch_epoll_worker] 0-epoll: Started thread
> with index 1
> [2015-09-24 01:57:31.756694] W [socket.c:588:__socket_rwv] 0-glusterfs:
> readv on 172.18.60.100:24007 failed (No data available)
> [2015-09-24 01:57:31.757143] E [rpc-clnt.c:362:saved_frames_unwind] (-->
> /usr/lib64/libglusterfs.so.0(_gf_log_callingfn+0x1eb)[0x7f87cb0de63b] (-->
> /usr/lib64/libgfrpc.so.0(saved_frames_unwind+0x1e7)[0x7f87caeaa1d7] (-->
> /usr/lib64/libgfrpc.so.0(saved_frames_destroy+0xe)[0x7f87caeaa2ee] (-->
> /usr/lib64/libgfrpc.so.0(rpc_clnt_connection_cleanup+0xab)[0x7f87caeaa3bb]
> (--> /usr/lib64/libgfrpc.so.0(rpc_clnt_notify+0x1c2)[0x7f87caeaa9f2] )))))
> 0-glusterfs: forced unwinding frame type(GlusterFS Handshake)
> op(GETSPEC(2)) called at 2015-09-24 01:57:31.755686 (xid=0x1)
> [2015-09-24 01:57:31.758030] E [glusterfsd-mgmt.c:1604:mgmt_getspec_cbk]
> 0-mgmt: failed to fetch volume file (key:rhs_gluster)
> [2015-09-24 01:57:31.758095] W [glusterfsd.c:1219:cleanup_and_exit]
> (-->/usr/lib64/libgfrpc.so.0(saved_frames_unwind+0x20e) [0x7f87caeaa1fe]
> -->/usr/sbin/glusterfs(mgmt_getspec_cbk+0x3f2) [0x40d5d2]
> -->/usr/sbin/glusterfs(cleanup_and_exit+0x65) [0x4059b5] ) 0-: received
> signum (0), shutting down
> [2015-09-24 01:57:31.758138] I [fuse-bridge.c:5595:fini] 0-fuse:
> Unmounting '/TEMP'.
> [2015-09-24 01:57:31.764511] W [glusterfsd.c:1219:cleanup_and_exit]
> (-->/lib64/libpthread.so.0(+0x79d1) [0x7f87ca1c69d1]
> -->/usr/sbin/glusterfs(glusterfs_sigwaiter+0xcd) [0x405e4d]
> -->/usr/sbin/glusterfs(cleanup_and_exit+0x65) [0x4059b5] ) 0-: received
> signum (15), shutting down
>
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 3:44 PM, Prasun Gera <prasun.gera at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> There were some posts regarding incompatibility between versions due to
>> the insecure ports option.
>> http://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/2015-August/023207.html.
>> Perhaps worth a shot ?
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 3:20 PM, Gluster Admin <gluster at hepcat.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I would love to know if i am doing something wrong but as it stands I
>>> have a redhat gluster 3.1 setup and the only native FUSE clients i can get
>>> to work are redhat.  I have had no success with Centos 6/7 and various
>>> gluster clients or OEL 6 in same case.
>>>
>>> I am hoping there is some option or something I am not setting and this
>>> will actually work.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 3:11 PM, Prasun Gera <prasun.gera at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Is this confirmed ? I have held off upgrading from 3.0 to 3.1. I have a
>>>> lot of Ubuntu clients who are using the ppa for the fuse clients. I don't
>>>> want to upgrade if it's known to break things.
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 10:40 AM, Gluster Admin <gluster at hepcat.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Just curious here if RH is purposely trying to prevent anyone but RHEL
>>>>> servers using their storage natively via the FUSE client?
>>>>>
>>>>> with RHGS 3.1 I can mount via fuse with no issues on RHEL 6/7 clients
>>>>> but no other variant of Gluster 3.6 or 3.7 client can connect to it.  Even
>>>>> tried installing the RHGS fuse and client libs with no success.  Same if i
>>>>> try to mount Gluster 3.7 from RHEL with FUSE so its both ways.
>>>>>
>>>>> Just a bummer as we have tons of non RHEL clients and would prefer not
>>>>> to setup NFS HA when the native client performs pretty well and covers all
>>>>> the HA without the hassle.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Gluster-users mailing list
>>>>> Gluster-users at gluster.org
>>>>> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-users mailing list
> Gluster-users at gluster.org
> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20150924/522e9793/attachment.html>