[Gluster-users] geo replication help

David F. Robinson david.robinson at corvidtec.com
Wed Sep 3 16:00:46 UTC 2014


I am reluctant to upgrade to 3.6.  I was going to wait until it had been 
out and the first patches were applied before switching.
My plan was to wait for 3.6.1 and let you guys work out some of the 
kinks of the new version :)...

I can test 3.6 if the geo-replication fixes are not going to be back 
ported to 3.5.2...

David


------ Original Message ------
From: "M S Vishwanath Bhat" <vbhat at redhat.com>
To: "David F. Robinson" <david.robinson at corvidtec.com>; "Niels de Vos" 
<ndevos at redhat.com>
Cc: gluster-users at gluster.org
Sent: 9/3/2014 11:30:09 AM
Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] geo replication help

>On 03/09/14 20:31, David F. Robinson wrote:
>>Is this bug-fix going to be in the 3.5.3 beta release?
>Not sure. I will have to check that. AFAIK the patches are present in 
>upstream and 3.6 branch. Is upgrading to 3.6 an option?
>
>Best Regards,
>Vishwanath
>
>>
>>David
>>
>>
>>------ Original Message ------
>>From: "Niels de Vos" <ndevos at redhat.com>
>>To: "M S Vishwanath Bhat" <vbhat at redhat.com>
>>Cc: "David F. Robinson" <david.robinson at corvidtec.com>; 
>>gluster-users at gluster.org
>>Sent: 8/15/2014 6:25:04 AM
>>Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] geo replication help
>>
>>>On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 04:17:11PM +0530, M S Vishwanath Bhat wrote:
>>>>  On 13/08/14 02:27, David F. Robinson wrote:
>>>>  >I was hoping someone could help me debug my geo-replication under
>>>>  >gluster 3.5.2.
>>>>  >I am trying to use geo-replication to create a lagged backup of my
>>>>  >data. What I wanted to do was to turn off the geo-replication
>>>>  >(gluster volume geo-replication homegfs
>>>>  >gfsib01bkp.corvidtec.com::homegfs_bkp stop) during the day, and
>>>>  >then turn it back on at midnight to allow the remote system to
>>>>  >sync.
>>>>  >If I stop the geo-replication, delete a file, and then restart the
>>>>  >geo-replication, the deletion never shows up on the slave system.
>>>>  >From the website below, I thought that it would pick up these
>>>>  >changes. Any suggestions for how I can get the changes made while
>>>>  >the geo-replication is stopped to propagate after restart the
>>>>  >geo-replication?
>>>>  This is a known issue with glusterfs-3.5.2. The problem is xsync 
>>>>can
>>>>  not handle deletes and renames. So when you restart the geo-rep, 
>>>>the
>>>>  change detection mechanism falls back to xsync even though the
>>>>  Changelog was ON, the whole time. So deletes and renames won't be
>>>>  propagated to slave in 3.5.2
>>>>
>>>>  The patch to fix this issue is already submitted and is present in
>>>>  glusterfs master branch. The fix should be available in
>>>>  glusterfs-3.6 soon.
>>>
>>>Can you point me to the bug/patch, or clone the bug for 3.5 and 
>>>provide
>>>a backport?
>>>
>>>Thanks,
>>>Niels
>>>
>>>>
>>>>  Best Regards,
>>>>  Vishwanath
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> >https://medium.com/@msvbhat/distributed-geo-replication-in-glusterfs-ec95f4393c50
>>>>  >
>>>>  >*/gluster volume geo-replication <master_volume>
>>>>  ><slave_volume>::<slave_volume> stop [force]/*
>>>>  >
>>>>  >Force option is to be used, when one of the node (or glusterd in
>>>>  >one of the node) is down. Once stopped, the session can be
>>>>  >restarted any time. Note that upon restarting of the session, the
>>>>  >change detection mechanism falls back to xsync mode. This happens
>>>>  >even though you have changelog generating journals, while the
>>>>  >geo-rep session is stopped.
>>>>  >
>>>>  >
>>>>  >
>>>>  >_______________________________________________
>>>>  >Gluster-users mailing list
>>>>  >Gluster-users at gluster.org
>>>>  >http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>>>>
>>>
>>>>  _______________________________________________
>>>>  Gluster-users mailing list
>>>>  Gluster-users at gluster.org
>>>>  http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>>
>



More information about the Gluster-users mailing list