[Gluster-users] libgfapi failover problem on replica bricks
Pranith Kumar Karampuri
pkarampu at redhat.com
Mon Sep 1 06:41:35 UTC 2014
On 09/01/2014 12:08 PM, Roman wrote:
> Well, as for me, VM-s are not very impacted by healing process. At
> least the munin server running with pretty high load (average rarely
> goes below 0,9 :) )had no problems. To create some more load I've made
> a copy of 590 MB file on the VM-s disk, It took 22 seconds. Which is
> ca 27 MB /sec or 214 Mbps/sec
>
> Servers are connected via 10 gbit network. Proxmox client is connected
> to the server with separate 1 gbps interface. We are thinking of
> moving it to 10gbps also.
>
> Here are some heal info which is pretty confusing.
>
> right after 1st server restored it connection, it was pretty clear:
>
> root at stor1:~# gluster volume heal HA-2TB-TT-Proxmox-cluster info
> Brick stor1:/exports/HA-2TB-TT-Proxmox-cluster/2TB/
> /images/124/vm-124-disk-1.qcow2 - Possibly undergoing heal
> Number of entries: 1
>
> Brick stor2:/exports/HA-2TB-TT-Proxmox-cluster/2TB/
> /images/124/vm-124-disk-1.qcow2 - Possibly undergoing heal
> /images/112/vm-112-disk-1.raw - Possibly undergoing heal
> Number of entries: 2
>
>
> some time later is says
> root at stor1:~# gluster volume heal HA-2TB-TT-Proxmox-cluster info
> Brick stor1:/exports/HA-2TB-TT-Proxmox-cluster/2TB/
> Number of entries: 0
>
> Brick stor2:/exports/HA-2TB-TT-Proxmox-cluster/2TB/
> Number of entries: 0
>
> while I can still see traffic between servers and still there was no
> messages about healing process completion.
On which machine do we have the mount?
Pranith
>
>
>
> 2014-08-29 10:02 GMT+03:00 Pranith Kumar Karampuri
> <pkarampu at redhat.com <mailto:pkarampu at redhat.com>>:
>
> Wow, this is great news! Thanks a lot for sharing the results :-).
> Did you get a chance to test the performance of the applications
> in the vm during self-heal?
> May I know more about your use case? i.e. How many vms and what is
> the avg size of each vm etc?
>
> Pranith
>
>
> On 08/28/2014 11:27 PM, Roman wrote:
>> Here are the results.
>> 1. still have problem with logs rotation. logs are being written
>> to .log.1 file, not .log file. any hints, how to fix?
>> 2. healing logs are now much more better, I can see the
>> successful message.
>> 3. both volumes with HD off and on successfully synced. the
>> volume with HD on synced much more faster.
>> 4. both VMs on volumes survived the outage, when new files were
>> added and deleted during outage.
>>
>> So replication works well with both HD on and off for volumes for
>> VM-s. With HD even faster. Need to solve the logging issue.
>>
>> Seems we could start production storage from this moment :) The
>> whole company will use it. Some distributed and some replicated.
>> Thanks for great product.
>>
>>
>> 2014-08-27 16:03 GMT+03:00 Roman <romeo.r at gmail.com
>> <mailto:romeo.r at gmail.com>>:
>>
>> Installed new packages. Will make some tests tomorrow. thanx.
>>
>>
>> 2014-08-27 14:10 GMT+03:00 Pranith Kumar Karampuri
>> <pkarampu at redhat.com <mailto:pkarampu at redhat.com>>:
>>
>>
>> On 08/27/2014 04:38 PM, Kaleb KEITHLEY wrote:
>>
>> On 08/27/2014 03:09 AM, Humble Chirammal wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> | From: "Pranith Kumar Karampuri"
>> <pkarampu at redhat.com <mailto:pkarampu at redhat.com>>
>> | To: "Humble Chirammal" <hchiramm at redhat.com
>> <mailto:hchiramm at redhat.com>>
>> | Cc: "Roman" <romeo.r at gmail.com
>> <mailto:romeo.r at gmail.com>>,
>> gluster-users at gluster.org
>> <mailto:gluster-users at gluster.org>, "Niels de
>> Vos" <ndevos at redhat.com <mailto:ndevos at redhat.com>>
>> | Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2014 12:34:22 PM
>> | Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] libgfapi failover
>> problem on replica bricks
>> |
>> |
>> | On 08/27/2014 12:24 PM, Roman wrote:
>> | > root at stor1:~# ls -l /usr/sbin/glfsheal
>> | > ls: cannot access /usr/sbin/glfsheal: No such
>> file or directory
>> | > Seems like not.
>> | Humble,
>> | Seems like the binary is still not packaged?
>>
>> Checking with Kaleb on this.
>>
>> ...
>>
>> | >>> |
>> | >>> | Humble/Niels,
>> | >>> | Do we have debs available for
>> 3.5.2? In 3.5.1
>> | >>> there was packaging
>> | >>> | issue where /usr/bin/glfsheal
>> is not packaged along
>> | >>> with the deb. I
>> | >>> | think that should be fixed
>> now as well?
>> | >>> |
>> | >>> Pranith,
>> | >>>
>> | >>> The 3.5.2 packages for debian is not
>> available yet. We
>> | >>> are co-ordinating internally to get it
>> processed.
>> | >>> I will update the list once its
>> available.
>> | >>>
>> | >>> --Humble
>>
>>
>> glfsheal isn't in our 3.5.2-1 DPKGs either. We
>> (meaning I) started with the 3.5.1 packaging bits
>> from Semiosis. Perhaps he fixed 3.5.1 after giving me
>> his bits.
>>
>> I'll fix it and spin 3.5.2-2 DPKGs.
>>
>> That is great Kaleb. Please notify semiosis as well in
>> case he is yet to fix it.
>>
>> Pranith
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Kaleb
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Best regards,
>> Roman.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Best regards,
>> Roman.
>
>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Roman.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://supercolony.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20140901/e80de830/attachment.html>
More information about the Gluster-users
mailing list