[Gluster-users] NFS crashes - bug 1010241
Ravishankar N
ravishankar at redhat.com
Thu Nov 20 01:53:55 UTC 2014
On 11/19/2014 10:11 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> We are running into this crash stacktrace on 3.4.2.
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010241
>
> The NFS process dies with no predictability. I've written a shell
> script that detects the crash and runs a process to completely kill all
> gluster processes and restart glusterd, which has eliminated
> customer-facing fallout from these problems.
No kill required. `gluster volume start <volname> force` should re-spawn the dead processes.
>
> Because of continual stability problems from day one, the gluster
> storage is being phased out, but there are many terabytes of data still
> used there. It would be nice to have it remain stable while we still
> use it. As soon as we can fully migrate all data to another storage
> solution, the gluster machines will be decommissioned.
>
> That BZ id is specific to version 3.6, and it's always difficult for
> mere mortals to determine which fixes have been backported to earlier
> releases.
>
A (not so?) easy way is to clone the source, checkout into the desired branch and grep the git-log for the commit message you're interested in.
> Has the fix for bug 1010241 been backported to any 3.4 release?
I just did the grep and no it's not. I don't know if a backport is possible.(CC'ed the respective devs). The (two) fixes are present in 3.5 though.
If so,
> is it possible for me to upgrade my servers without being concerned
> about the distributed+replicated volume going offline? When we upgraded
> from 3.3 to 3.4, the volume was not fully functional as soon as we
> upgraded one server, and did not become fully functional until all
> servers were upgraded and rebooted.
>
> Assuming again that there is a 3.4 version with the fix ... the gluster
> peers that I use for NFS do not have any bricks. Would I need to
> upgrade ALL the servers, or could I get away with just upgrading the
> servers that are being used for NFS?
Heterogeneous op-version cluster is not supported. You would need to upgrade all servers.
http://www.gluster.org/community/documentation/index.php/Upgrade_to_3.5
Thanks,
Ravi
>
> Thanks,
> Shawn
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-users mailing list
> Gluster-users at gluster.org
> http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>
More information about the Gluster-users
mailing list