[Gluster-users] Why is xfs recommended?

Pranith Kumar Karampuri pkarampu at redhat.com
Thu Nov 13 05:53:46 UTC 2014

On 11/12/2014 10:31 PM, Dennis Schafroth wrote:
> Is it know whether the fix will work for other filesystems like btrfs 
> and HFS+
hi Dennis,
     This problem happens because of the way gluster handles 64-bit 
offsets introduced in ext4.

> cheers,
> :-Dennis
>> On 12 Nov 2014, at 13:22 , Pranith Kumar Karampuri 
>> <pkarampu at redhat.com <mailto:pkarampu at redhat.com>> wrote:
>>>> n Wed, 12 Nov 2014 09:41:17 AM you wrote:
>>>>> I have seen weirdness with ext4 and replicated volumes, see thread
>>>>> "[Gluster-devel] Duplicate entries and other weirdness in a 3*4 volume"
>>>>> started at 17 July.
>>>> Interesting, thanks.
>>> It is a bug in gluster andhttp://review.gluster.com/#/c/8201/is the 
>>> fix for it.
>> Some more information about this bug: Only 3.6.1 release is affected 
>> by this issue. Except that release no other release has this problem. 
>> I was under the impression that this patch was already merged. This 
>> patch will definitely be there for 3.6.2. I am sorry for the slippage 
>> :'-(

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://supercolony.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20141113/604992f8/attachment.html>

More information about the Gluster-users mailing list