[Gluster-users] Graceful way to kill a brick process

Atin Mukherjee amukherj at redhat.com
Tue Nov 11 08:11:30 UTC 2014

Can you let us know why do you need to explicitly kill the brick
process? replace-brick ideally does the same and spawns a new process.


On 11/11/2014 12:37 PM, Raghuram BK wrote:
> f we'd like to replace a disk on which a brick resides

More information about the Gluster-users mailing list