[Gluster-users] Cap on random write at 3,5 MB/s ?

gbyers at indue.com.au gbyers at indue.com.au
Tue May 13 22:58:15 UTC 2014


FYI, we've experienced similar performance issues when using mismatched Gluster versions between clients & servers.

Regards,
Grant

-----Original Message-----
From: gluster-users-bounces at gluster.org [mailto:gluster-users-bounces at gluster.org] On Behalf Of Ric Wheeler
Sent: Tuesday, 13 May 2014 9:05 PM
To: Kim Holmebakken; gluster-users at gluster.org
Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] Cap on random write at 3,5 MB/s ?

On 05/12/2014 01:57 PM, Kim Holmebakken wrote:
> Hi all,
> I am currently working on my bachelor thesis, and using glusterfs between 
> frontend servers that are connected to backend slow storage.
>
> The frontend servers have a SSD cache and are iSCSI initiators to the slow 
> backend storage(HDD RAID1+0).
>
> We are using a xfs/bcache setup.
>
> When testing performance on a gluster mounted folder from a clientserver, the 
> performance shows 3,5 MB/S on my random write tests. This is the same result 
> for every random write test i run.
>
> Is this something that is limited by GlusterFS in itself? or should I turn my 
> gaze at something else ?
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Kim Holmebakken

Hi Kim,

Very hard to understand from the above where your bottleneck is.

The usual way to tackle performance debugging is to test each layer of the 
system where possible so you can isolate the issue.

What exactly is your random write test? What specific IO pattern does it generate?

Can you run it against the XFS/bcache setup locally without glusterfs? How does 
it do there?

Thanks!

Ric

_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users at gluster.org
http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users



More information about the Gluster-users mailing list