[Gluster-users] Does QEMU offer High Availability

[Daniel Baker]

Hi Lucian,

but Glusterfs is at least trying to replicate the QEMU image onto the
other node ?  That's the whole point of the replication isn’t it ?


Thanks for the help,

Dan

> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Message: 1
> Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 20:29:30 +0700
> From: Daniel Baker <info at collisiondetection.biz>
> To: gluster-users at gluster.org
> Subject: [Gluster-users] Does QEMU offer High Availability
> Message-ID: <5326F8BA.7010300 at collisiondetection.biz>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> 
> HI all,
> 
> If I use QEMU in Glusterfs 3.4.2 can I achieve true High Availability.
> 
> If I have two nodes that are clustering a QEMU image and one of them
> goes down will the other QEMU image take its place.
> 
> Can I really achieve that ?
> 
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Dan
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 2
> Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 13:48:45 +0000
> From: Nux! <nux at li.nux.ro>
> To: gluster-users at gluster.org
> Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] Does QEMU offer High Availability
> Message-ID: <c5ba49ac0de0faf0ab1257a7f1800f31 at li.nux.ro>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
> 
> On 17.03.2014 13:29, Daniel Baker wrote:
>> HI all,
>>
>> If I use QEMU in Glusterfs 3.4.2 can I achieve true High Availability.
>>
>> If I have two nodes that are clustering a QEMU image and one of them
>> goes down will the other QEMU image take its place.
>>
>> Can I really achieve that ?
> 
> Dan,
> 
> This is not really a discussion for the gluster lists.
> 
> You should ask KVM people, but to answer you briefly:
> - No, KVM is just a hypervisor, it runs virtual machines and that's all 
> it does.
> You need to run additional RedHat clustering stuff around it to achieve 
> HA.
> 
> HTH
> Lucian
>