[Gluster-users] 'T' sticky bit set on some files after rebalance
Viktor Villafuerte
viktor.villafuerte at optusnet.com.au
Mon Mar 3 22:28:39 UTC 2014
Also I should say that all bricks still have plenty of free space, but
there were network problems in the LAB..
On Tue 04 Mar 2014 09:26:23, Viktor Villafuerte wrote:
> I've found this
>
> [root at gluster01.uat ~]# getfattr -dm . Alien3_1992_25_HLS_layer2_642000_282.ts
> getfattr: Removing leading '/' from absolute path names
> # file:
> # Alien3_1992_25_HLS_layer2_642000_282.ts
> trusted.gfid="��\012�h�Bȹ!v�/�,�"
> trusted.glusterfs.dht.linkto="cdn-uat-replicate-0"
>
> [root at gluster01.uat ~]#
>
> From some smart posts I found that this happenes when a brick fills and
> the file is then placed on another brick. The extended attr then points
> to the file's new location.
>
> This would point to the 'cdn-uat-replicate-0' pair of bricks, however
> the files are not there. They are on another pair or replicated bricks.
>
> cdn-uat-replicate-0 is in fact gluster0[8,7].uat
>
> The actual files are located on 'cdn-uat-replicate-3' which is
> gluster0[5,6].uat
>
>
> Now, the actual Gluster mount seems ok, the files do exist and there's
> nothing I can do to fix this with heal, rebalance and friends.
>
> I think I'm just gonna delete them..
>
>
> v
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sat 01 Mar 2014 17:38:01, Viktor Villafuerte wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > after rebalance with distributed replicated volume setup I'm left with
> > files with sticky bit set. I have currently 3 replicas and only two of
> > them contain these files. They only appeared after second rebalance 2 ->
> > 3 replicas. 1 -> 2 replicas rebalance finished with all files not having
> > the sticky bit set
> >
> > 1 x (1x1) => 2 x (1x1)
> > rebalance completed ok
> > no files with --------T set
> >
> > 2 x (1x1) => 3 x (1x1)
> > rebalance completed ok
> > replica 0 - 95 files with 'T'
> > replica 1 - 0 files with 'T'
> > replica 2 - 265 files with 'T'
> >
> > eg
> >
> > ---------T 2 1000 1000 0 Feb 28 23:53
> > ThePinkPanther2_2009_23_HLS_layer4_1450000_89.ts
> >
> >
> >
> > somehow I don't think this is expected. Rebalance does not change
> > anything and all shows as things are ok... but are they?
> >
> > Anybody has any pointers for this?
> >
> >
> > --
> > Regards
> >
> > Viktor Villafuerte
> > Optus Internet Engineering
> > t: 02 808-25265
> > _______________________________________________
> > Gluster-users mailing list
> > Gluster-users at gluster.org
> > http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>
> --
> Regards
>
> Viktor Villafuerte
> Optus Internet Engineering
> t: 02 808-25265
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-users mailing list
> Gluster-users at gluster.org
> http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
--
Regards
Viktor Villafuerte
Optus Internet Engineering
t: 02 808-25265
More information about the Gluster-users
mailing list