[Gluster-users] [Gluster-devel] glusterfs-3.4.1qa2 released

[Anand Avati]

Thanks Lukas. Copying Lubomir. Can you confirm that
http://review.gluster.org/5693 is no more needed then? Also, can you please
vote on http://review.gluster.org/5979?

Thanks,
Avati



On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 4:39 AM, Lukáš Bezdička <lukas.bezdicka at gooddata.com
> wrote:

> I was unable to reproduce the issue with patch #2 from
> http://review.gluster.org/#/c/5979/
>
> Thank you.
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 11:52 AM, Anand Avati <avati at gluster.org> wrote:
>
>> Please pick #2 resubmission, that is fine.
>>
>> Avati
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 2:48 AM, Lukáš Bezdička <
>> lukas.bezdicka at gooddata.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Will take about 2 hours to setup test env, also build seems to be failed
>>> but does not seem to be caused by the patch :/
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 11:38 AM, Anand Avati <avati at gluster.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Can you please confirm if http://review.gluster.org/5979 fixes the
>>>> problem of #998967 for you? If so we will backport and include the
>>>> patch in 3.4.1.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Avati
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 2:03 AM, Anand Avati <avati at gluster.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I have a theory for #998967 (that posix-acl is not doing the right
>>>>> thing after chmod/setattr). Preparing a patch, will appreciate if you can
>>>>> test it quickly.
>>>>>
>>>>> Avati
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 1:26 AM, Lukáš Bezdička <
>>>>> lukas.bezdicka at gooddata.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> No, I see issues reported in
>>>>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=998967 which is probably
>>>>>> related to BZ#991035.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 7:40 PM, Vijay Bellur <vbellur at redhat.com>wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 09/18/2013 02:45 PM, Lukáš Bezdička wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Tested with glusterfs-3.4.1qa2-1.el6.x86_**64 issue with ACL is
>>>>>>>> still
>>>>>>>> there, unless one applies patch from http://review.gluster.org/#/c/
>>>>>>>> **5693/ <http://review.gluster.org/#/c/5693/>
>>>>>>>> which shoots through the caches and takes ACLs from server or sets
>>>>>>>> entry-timeout=0 it returns wrong values. This is probably because
>>>>>>>> ACL
>>>>>>>> mask being applied incorrectly in posix_acl_inherit_mode, but I'm
>>>>>>>> no C
>>>>>>>> expert to say so :(
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Checking again. Are you seeing issues reported in both BZ#991035 and
>>>>>>> BZ#990830 with 3.4.1qa2?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>> Vijay
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Gluster-users mailing list
>>>>>> Gluster-users at gluster.org
>>>>>> http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://supercolony.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20130920/0b6cfe6e/attachment.html>