[Gluster-users] Peer list question

[Vijay Bellur]

On 10/29/2013 04:12 PM, Robert Hajime Lanning wrote:
> On 10/28/13 23:34, B.K.Raghuram wrote:
>> The problem I am seeing is this. I am using hostnames to add peers
>> into the pool and the output of gluster peer status reflects this.
>> However, the output of the --remote-host peer status gives the name of
>> the current host in the form of an IP address. Why this discrepancy?
>
> Was the current host the one you started the cluster from? (ie. you did
> peer probe to the other hosts from the current one?)
>
> If that is the case, this is a known issue.  You just need to run peer
> probe from a different peer back to the one in question.  That will
> correct the peer listing.
>
> As for having the current host in the peer list, a host does not peer
> itself, so the context would be incorrect to list it.
>
> Though, if the current host was not a peer in the cluster, then it would
> not list any other peers.
>

'gluster pool list' in 3.5 contains information about all nodes in the 
cluster (including the host on which command is issued).

-Vijay