[Gluster-users] GlusterFS HA testing feedback

Bryan Whitehead driver at megahappy.net
Tue Oct 22 18:04:41 UTC 2013


So gluster is just running on 10Mbit nic cards or 56Gbit Infiniband?


With 1G nic cards, assuming only replica=2, you are looking at pretty
limited IO for gluster to work with. That can cause long pauses and other
timeouts in my experience.


On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 2:42 AM, José A. Lausuch Sales
<jlausuch at gmail.com>wrote:

> Hi,
>
> we are currently evaluating GlusterFS for a production environment. Our
> focus is on the high-availability features of GlusterFS. However, our tests
> have not worked out well. Hence I am seeking feedback from you.
>
>
> In our planned production environment, Gluster should provide shared
> storage for VM disk images. So, our very basic initial test setup is as
> follows:
>
>
> We are using two servers, each providing a single brick of a replicated
> gluster volume (Gluster 3.4.1). A third server runs a test-VM (Ubuntu 13.04
> on QEMU 1.3.0 and libvirt 1.0.3) which uses a disk image file stored on the
> gluster volume as block device (/dev/vdb). For testing purposes, the root
> file system of this VM (/dev/vda) is a disk image NOT stored on the gluster
> volume.
>
>
> To test the high-availability features of gluster under load, we run FIO
> inside the VM directly on the vdb block device (see configuration below).
> Up to now, we tested reading only. The test procedure is as follows:
>
> 1. We start FIO inside the VM and observe by means of "top" which of the
> two servers receives the read requests (i.e., increased CPU load of the
> glusterd process). Let’s say that Server1 has the CPU load by glusterfsd.
>
> 2. While FIO is running, we take down the network of this Server1 and
> observe if the Server2 takes over.
>
> 3. This “fail over” works (almost 100% of the times), we see the CPU load
> from glusterfsd on Server2. As expected, Server1 does not have any load
> because is “offline”.
>
> 4. After a while we bring up the NIC on Server1 again. In this step we
> realized that the expected behavior is that when bringing up this NIC, this
> server should take over again (something like active-passive behavior) but
> this happens only 5-10% of the times.  The CPU load is still on Server2.
>
> 5. After some time, we bring down the NIC on Server2 expecting that
> Server1 takes over.  This second "fail over" crashes. The VM complains
> about I/O errors which can only be resolved by restarting the VM and
> sometimes even removing and creating the volume again.
>
>
> After some test, we realized that if restarting the glusterd daemon
> (/etc/init.d/glusterd restart) on Server1 after step 3 or before step 4,
> the Server1 takes over automatically without bringing down Server2 or
> anything like that.
>
>
> We tested this using the normal FUSE mount and libgfapi. If using FUSE,
> the local mount sometimes becomes unavailable (ls shows not more files) if
> the failover fails.
>
>
> We have a few fundamental questions in this regard:
>
> i) Is Gluster supposed to handle such a scenario or are we making wrong
> assumptions? Because the only solution we found is to restart the daemon
> when a network outage occurs, but this is not acceptable in a real scenario
> with VMs running real applications.
>
> ii) What is the recommended configuration in terms of caching (QEMU:
> cache=none/writethrough/writeback) and direct I/O (FIO and Gluster) to
> maximize the reliability of the failover process? We varied the parameters
> but could find a working configuration. Do these parameters have an impact
> at all?
>
>
>
>
> FIO test specification:
>
> [global]
> direct=1
> ioengine=libaio
> iodepth=4
> filename=/dev/vdb
> runtime=300
> numjobs=1
>
> [maxthroughput]
> rw=read
> bs=16k
>
>
>
> VM configuration:
>
> <domain type='kvm' id='6'>
>   <name>testvm</name>
>   <uuid>93877c03-605b-ed67-1ab2-2ba16b5fb6b5</uuid>
>   <memory unit='KiB'>2097152</memory>
>   <currentMemory unit='KiB'>2097152</currentMemory>
>   <vcpu placement='static'>1</vcpu>
>   <os>
>     <type arch='x86_64' machine='pc-1.1'>hvm</type>
>     <boot dev='hd'/>
>   </os>
>   <features>
>     <acpi/>
>     <apic/>
>     <pae/>
>   </features>
>   <clock offset='utc'/>
>   <on_poweroff>destroy</on_poweroff>
>   <on_reboot>restart</on_reboot>
>   <on_crash>restart</on_crash>
>   <devices>
>     <emulator>/usr/bin/kvm</emulator>
>     <disk type='block' device='disk'>
>       <driver name='qemu' type='raw' cache='writethrough'/>
>       <source dev='/mnt/local/io-perf.img'/>
>       <target dev='vda' bus='virtio'/>
>       <alias name='virtio-disk0'/>
>       <address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x00' slot='0x04'
> function='0x0'/>
>     </disk>
>     <disk type='block' device='disk'>
>       <driver name='qemu' type='raw' cache='writethrough'/>
>       <source dev='/mnt/shared/io-perf-testdisk.img'/>
>       <target dev='vdb' bus='virtio'/>
>       <alias name='virtio-disk1'/>
>       <address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x00' slot='0x07'
> function='0x0'/>
>     </disk>
>     <controller type='usb' index='0'>
>       <alias name='usb0'/>
>       <address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x00' slot='0x01'
> function='0x2'/>
>     </controller>
>     <interface type='network'>
>       <mac address='52:54:00:36:5f:dd'/>
>       <source network='default'/>
>       <target dev='vnet0'/>
>       <model type='virtio'/>
>       <alias name='net0'/>
>       <address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x00' slot='0x03'
> function='0x0'/>
>     </interface>
>     <input type='mouse' bus='ps2'/>
>     <graphics type='vnc' port='5900' autoport='yes' listen='127.0.0.1'>
>       <listen type='address' address='127.0.0.1'/>
>     </graphics>
>     <video>
>       <model type='cirrus' vram='9216' heads='1'/>
>       <alias name='video0'/>
>       <address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x00' slot='0x02'
> function='0x0'/>
>     </video>
>     <memballoon model='virtio'>
>       <alias name='balloon0'/>
>       <address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x00' slot='0x05'
> function='0x0'/>
>     </memballoon>
>   </devices>
>   <seclabel type='none'/>
> </domain>
>
>
>
>
> Thank you very much in advance,
> Jose Lausuch
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-users mailing list
> Gluster-users at gluster.org
> http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://supercolony.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20131022/5191d20f/attachment.html>


More information about the Gluster-users mailing list