[Gluster-users] Gluster 3.3 - good to use?

[R, Robin]

Hi,

I've used Gluster-3.3.0 (with replica 2 on all volumes) with good success.

When updating to Gluster-3.3.1, I hit a bug on the NFS which caused the NFS
daemon to die.

I filed that NFS bug on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902857

Another user also commented that he hit the same NFS bug on 3.3.1 in the
bugzilla report.

I'm not certain what I did to trigger that NFS bug (I could not replicate
it on test systems -- my test systems do not have as much data though).

I downgraded to 3.3.0 which has been running fine for at least half a year
now.

Robin

On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 8:58 AM, Rafał Radecki <radecki.rafal at gmail.com>wrote:

> Hi All.
>
> I want to use mentioned version of glusterfs in a simple master/slave
> setup (production servers). Two nodes have a replicated volume and the
> both mount it using glusterfs. What are your experiences with gluster
> 3.3? Is it stable? Have you had any serious problems? I do not have
> much experience with gluster and would like to avoid problems if
> possible.
>
> Best regards,
> Rafal Radecki.
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-users mailing list
> Gluster-users at gluster.org
> http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://supercolony.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20130207/bb37e58a/attachment.html>