[Gluster-users] worth upgrading from 3.2.7 to 3.3.1?

[Joe Julian]

I would check my hardware then. With 3.3.1 I have self-healed vm images, and replaced bricks in the vm image volume both with and without migration - all while timing reading and writing files twice the size of the vm memory allocation. Not only was there no pause, but it didn't even slow down. 

Christian Wittwer <wittwerch at gmail.com> wrote:

>Hi Whit,
>To be honest, I don't see any improvements since 3.2 concerning virtual
>machines (maybe under the hood?). Self-heal is still blocking and
>performance is not better.
>We've waited over 6 months for the 3.3 release and it was really
>disappointing for me personally.
>
>Cheers,
>Christian
>
>
>2012/11/27 Whit Blauvelt <whit.gluster at transpect.com>
>
>> Gerald,
>>
>> How's the VM's on Gluster thing working? Stable? Fast enough where
>speed's
>> not essential?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Whit
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 09:36:24AM -0600, Gerald Brandt wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > I have speed and stability increases with 3.3.0/3.3.1.  If you're
>> running VM's on gluster, it's a no brainer as well.
>> >
>> > Gerald
>> _______________________________________________
>> Gluster-users mailing list
>> Gluster-users at gluster.org
>> http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>>
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>_______________________________________________
>Gluster-users mailing list
>Gluster-users at gluster.org
>http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://supercolony.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20121127/0c3e91a8/attachment.html>