[Gluster-users] gluster behavior

[nhadie ramos]

thank you for the info. just a follow up question. in case the hard
disk fail e.g. on server2, but i have a snapshot of that disk from a
day before.
if i re-enable it on the gluster again, will it still recover the lost
files that is stilll on the hard disk of server1 ?

On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 7:55 PM, Whit Blauvelt
<whit.gluster at transpect.com> wrote:
> Yes, it's correct behavior. Only writes and edits through the gluster mount
> are handled immediately by gluster.
>
> Whit
>
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 10:30:03AM +0800, nhadie ramos wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I am just starting to do some tests on gluster, i have 2 servers which
>> i setup as replicate:
>>
>>
>> server1:
>>
>> /dev/md0 mounted on /myharddisk
>>
>> created a gluster volume called testvolume
>> mounted the glustervolume as /testgluster
>> txtfile.txt on /myharddisk
>>
>> server2:
>>
>> /dev/md0 mounted on /myharddsik
>> created a gluster volume called testvolume
>> mounted the glustervolume as /testgluster
>> txtfile.txt on /myharddsik
>>
>> editedt txtfile.txt on server1:/testgluster changes took effect on
>> server1:/testgluster, server2:/testgluster and serv2:/myharddisk
>> (expected result)
>> edited txtfile.txt on server1:/myharddsik changes did not replicate on
>> server1:/testgluster and server2:/testgluster unitl i did a self-heal
>> but server2:/myharddisk did not update, unless i delete the existing
>> file on it.
>>
>> Is this the correct behavior? Thanks in advance! (sorry if the email
>> confuses you)
>>
>> Regards,
>> Ron
>> _______________________________________________
>> Gluster-users mailing list
>> Gluster-users at gluster.org
>> http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>