[Gluster-users] gluster as a storage backend to samba
peljasz at yahoo.co.uk
Mon Mar 26 12:16:49 UTC 2012
seems like 'posix locking = no' helps
but that would be totally opposite to what gluster
documentation says and what samba manual suggests "....
Default: posix locking = yes .... You should never need to
disable this parameter.."
I wonder whether it posses any kind of negative
implications? Have you noticed/experienced any side effects?
On 26/03/12 12:36, Daniel Müller wrote:
> comment = share on glusterfs brick
> path = /mnt/glusterfs/windows/wingroup/share
> posix locking =NO
> valid users = @"Domain Admins" @shareusergroup
> directory mask=2770
> force directory mode=2770
> create mask = 2770
> force create mode=2770
> force security mode=2770
> force directory security mode=2770
> force group = shareusergroup
> browseable = no
> EDV Daniel Müller
> Leitung EDV
> Tropenklinik Paul-Lechler-Krankenhaus
> Paul-Lechler-Str. 24
> 72076 Tübingen
> Tel.: 07071/206-463, Fax: 07071/206-499
> eMail: mueller at tropenklinik.de
> Internet: www.tropenklinik.de
> Von: gluster-users-bounces at gluster.org [mailto:gluster-users-bounces at gluster.org] Im Auftrag von lejeczek
> Gesendet: Montag, 26. März 2012 13:28
> An: gluster-users at gluster.org
> Betreff: Re: [Gluster-users] gluster as a storage backend to samba
> actually I get "locking problem" very frequently, even if only copying files from samba/gluster net share,
> is there a fix/solution for these problems?
> On 26/03/12 12:14, lejeczek wrote:
> dear all,
> how does as in the subject work,
> I can see users run into number of different troubles, like here:
> has anybody got it worked out? m$ office stuff, does it work with gluster?
> Gluster-users mailing list
> Gluster-users at gluster.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Gluster-users