[Gluster-users] NFS mounts with glusterd on localhost - reliable or not?
mangoo at wpkg.org
Fri Jul 13 10:05:40 UTC 2012
On 07/13/2012 05:46 PM, David Coulson wrote:
> On 7/13/12 5:29 AM, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
>> Killing the option to use NFS mounts on localhost is certainly quite
>> the opposite to my performance needs!
> He was saying you can't run kernel NFS server and gluster NFS server at
> the same time, on the same host. There is nothing stopping you from
> mounting localhost:/volume on all your boxes. That is exactly how our
> 3.2.5 and 3.3.0 environments access volumes for the performance reasons
> you identified.
OK, but it deadlocks when we write, unless we use "sync" option, which
hurts the performance.
As mentioned by Rajesh Amaravathi:
"This is a problem generic to fuse/userspace filesystems."
Mid term, are there any plans to deal with this problem?
I understand the fix may need to be partially done on the kernel side,
but it would be very beneficial to glusterfs.
More information about the Gluster-users