[Gluster-users] question re. current state of art/practice

[Arnold Krille]

On Friday 17 February 2012 06:59:40 Thomas Jackson wrote:
> Just as a small warning, Sheepdog is well away from being production ready -
> the big problem that I can see is that it won't de-allocate blocks once an
> image is deleted! It definitely has promise for the future though.

To add to this: ceph and xtreemfs are at the same stage. ceph lost part of my 
test-data and xtreemfs was slow and unstable and hung up my system two or 
three times.

Drbd+gfs2 proved slow and unworkable without node-fencing.

Gluster at least didn't result in any kernel-panics (yet) despite my very 
"unstable" setup with only one of three nodes running full-time...

Have fun,

Arnold
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://supercolony.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20120216/d3515aef/attachment.sig>