[Gluster-users] Exorbitant cost to achieve redundancy??
whit.gluster at transpect.com
Tue Feb 14 13:06:40 UTC 2012
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 08:39:31AM +0000, Brian Candler wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 11:45:10PM -0500, Whit Blauvelt wrote:
> > If Gluster gets the geo-rep
> > thing working right, it'll be the low-cost solution there too.
> Do I hear implied from that that geo-rep *doesn't* work right yet? Have you
> some pointers on what its limitations are? This is something I was thinking
> of deploying (but haven't got as far as testing)
Sorry, I implied too much. Haven't tested. Just a second-hand impression
from other reports here. Since there've been fewer complaints lately, for
all I know they've already got the kinks out. It would be nice to see a few
reports of success.
More information about the Gluster-users