[Gluster-users] Does brick fs play a large role on listing files client side?
Adam Tygart
mozes at k-state.edu
Thu Dec 6 05:07:15 UTC 2012
In response to Whit, this patch hasn't made it into a kernel release.
As a partial response to myself: For others looking to patch their own
kernel source, it won't apply to anything older than 3.7-rc1 without the
incorporation of a much larger uapi patchset (probably all history here,
and then some:
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git;a=history;f=include/uapi).
I consider this too much of a change to incorporate into my running
system.
--
Adam
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 8:31 PM, Adam Tygart <mozes at k-state.edu> wrote:
> Also, if we were to apply this patch to an existing kernel tree would
> GlusterFS automatically make use of it? Or would we need a special mount
> option?
>
> --
> Adam
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 6:48 PM, Whit Blauvelt <whit.gluster at transpect.com>wrote:
>
>> Avanti,
>>
>> For those of us willing compile kernels when there's a distinct advantage,
>> has this patch made it into a kernel release? If so, which?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Whit
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 04:35:39PM -0800, Anand Avati wrote:
>> > Support for READDIRPLUS in FUSE improves directory listing performance
>> > significantly. You will have to hold on till
>> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/
>> > kernel/git/mszeredi/fuse.git;a=commit;h=
>> > 81aecda8796572e490336680530d53a10771c2a9 trickles down into your distro
>> kernel
>> > however.
>> >
>> > Avati
>> _______________________________________________
>> Gluster-users mailing list
>> Gluster-users at gluster.org
>> http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://supercolony.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20121205/5a087452/attachment.html>
More information about the Gluster-users
mailing list