[Gluster-users] ZFS + Linux + Glusterfs for a production ready 100+ TB NAS on cloud

[Jon Tegner]

Sorry for a stupid question, but would there be issues using glusterfs 
based on several 11 TB ext4-bricks?

/jon


On 09/24/2011 09:26 PM, Anand Babu Periasamy wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 12:14 PM, Liam Slusser <lslusser at gmail.com 
> <mailto:lslusser at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     I have a very large, >500tb, Gluster cluster on Centos Linux but I
>     use the XFS filesystem in a production role.  Each xfs filesystem
>     (brick) is around 32tb in size.  No problems all runs very well.
>
>     ls
>
> Yes XFS is the way to go for large partitions > 16TB (or even 12TB). 
> XFS is brought back to life by Red Hat. Most of the XFS developers are 
> now RH employees. We can confidently recommend XFS now.
>
> -- 
> Anand Babu Periasamy
> Blog [ http://www.unlocksmith.org ]
> Twitter [ http://twitter.com/abperiasamy ]
>
> Imagination is more important than knowledge --Albert Einstein
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-users mailing list
> Gluster-users at gluster.org
> http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://supercolony.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20110925/8c9ab127/attachment.html>