[Gluster-users] ZFS + Linux + Glusterfs for a production ready 100+ TB NAS on cloud

[Craig Carl]

XFS is a valid alternative to ZFS on Linux. If I remember correctly any operation that requires modifying a lot of xattr's can be slower than ext*, have you noticed anything like that? You might see slower rebalances or self healing?

Craig

Sent from a mobile device, please excuse my tpyos.

On Sep 24, 2011, at 22:14, Liam Slusser <lslusser at gmail.com> wrote:

> I have a very large, >500tb, Gluster cluster on Centos Linux but I use the XFS filesystem in a production role.  Each xfs filesystem (brick) is around 32tb in size.  No problems all runs very well.
> 
> ls
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://supercolony.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20110924/f502d8c3/attachment.html>