[Gluster-users] Inputs requested on 3.2.0
Vidya Sakar
vs at gluster.com
Thu May 26 15:08:30 UTC 2011
Thanks to everyone for all the inputs. I will get back with responses to
each of your suggestions shortly.
Thanks,
VS
--
Vidya Sakar N
Senior Engineering Manager
Gluster Software India (P) Ltd
Bangalore
On Wednesday 25 May 2011 10:54 PM, Mohit Anchlia wrote:
> Hi Vidya,
>
> Thanks for asking. I think it will be worthwhile to look at the
> archives and mailing list to see what other people have reported for
> 3.2. Few people already downgraded so not sure if they filed a bug.
> But things that I have heard here:
>
> 1) gfid mismatch issue. Bug was filed
> 2) 0 byte file size. Bug was filed
> 3) Multiple files of same name showing up on the clent side
> 4) client hangs and crash
> 5) xattr mismatch on gluster mount points causing split brain errors.
> Bug was filed
>
> I certainly want to use 3.2 for geo-rep feature but problems that I am
> seeing that others have faced has put me back and waiting for 3.2 to
> become more stable. It will be really good to make 3.2 really solid
> and stable.
>
> Thanks
>
> On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 8:25 AM, Udo Waechter
> <udo.waechter at uni-osnabrueck.de> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> for us, gluster 3.2.0 really messed up everything in a distribute/replicate setup. Everything should be mentioned in this thread. http://gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/2011-May/007705.html
>>
>> The most important features for us would be:
>> 1. 100% posix compatibility (this is already mentioned as a feature in the FAQ!!!)
>> 2. Better documentation. All the options and their settings do not really explain what they do.
>> I could guess that performance.cache-size somehow influences performance, but for us changing it to very high (4Gbs and more) and very low (128Mb) did not change a thing. Same for stat-prefetch (which is supposed to make ls quickier) on/off: nothing. Would be nice to see some scenarios/settings and their benchmarks.
>>
>> Thanks for the effort,
>> udo.
>>
>> On 24.05.2011, at 12:52, Vidya Sakar wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Hello all,
>>>
>>> We are planing a 3.2.1 release and we would like to hear from you all on the specific concerns you may have about 3.2.0 stability and any bugs that you are hitting in 3.2.0 (if they already have not been filed yet). Inputs on 3.1.x is welcome too, please be specific on the information you provide us. Community feedback is of paramount importance to us, please file bugs to help us address them soon.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> VS
>>>
>>> --
>>> Vidya Sakar N
>>> Senior Engineering Manager
>>> Gluster Software India (P) Ltd
>>> Bangalore
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Gluster-users mailing list
>>> Gluster-users at gluster.org
>>> http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>>>
>>>
>> --
>> :: udo waechter - root at zoide.net :: N 52º16'30.5" E 8º3'10.1"
>> :: genuine input for your ears: http://auriculabovinari.de
>> :: your eyes: http://ezag.zoide.net
>> :: your brain: http://zoide.net
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Gluster-users mailing list
>> Gluster-users at gluster.org
>> http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>>
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-users mailing list
> Gluster-users at gluster.org
> http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>
More information about the Gluster-users
mailing list