[Gluster-users] Substitute for SMP?
landman at scalableinformatics.com
Fri May 27 15:12:01 UTC 2011
On 05/27/2011 11:13 AM, Jon Tegner wrote:
> Would you say that the inefficiencies related to the ram disk would
> remove all advantages of using ram instead of hard drives (or could it
> still be worth a try)?
Depends upon many things. Best thing to do is test.
> As for speed, I would think that latency would be the most critical -
> but I don't really know, it its the code of a colleague of mine (I was
> trying to come up with a replacement of his SMP-machine which is getting
Ok. Are they IO bound with small reads/writes, large reads/writes?
Gluster is very good for the larger file IO and many simultaneous
Joseph Landman, Ph.D
Founder and CEO
Scalable Informatics Inc.
email: landman at scalableinformatics.com
web : http://scalableinformatics.com
phone: +1 734 786 8423 x121
fax : +1 866 888 3112
cell : +1 734 612 4615
More information about the Gluster-users