[Gluster-users] tuning glusterfs?
Jiann-Ming Su
sujiannming at gmail.com
Tue Jan 19 17:30:39 UTC 2010
I ran a simple bonnie++ benchmark on 3.0.0. The read performance
through FUSE is horrible. Are there some parameters that can be tuned
to improve read performance?
GlusterFS:
Version 1.96 ------Sequential Output------ --Sequential Input- --Random-
Concurrency 1 -Per Chr- --Block-- -Rewrite- -Per Chr- --Block-- --Seeks--
Machine Size K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP /sec %CP
localhost.loc 2000M 4 31 23901 30 1632 13 3 33 6289 11 68.9 8
Latency 7834ms 140ms 340ms 7767ms 543ms 757ms
Version 1.96 ------Sequential Create------ --------Random Create--------
localhost.localdoma -Create-- --Read--- -Delete-- -Create-- --Read--- -Delete--
files /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP
16 148 14 1365 27 234 18 123 16 350 18 134 10
Latency 123ms 22783us 123ms 297ms 19895us 157ms
Locate ext3 filesystem:
Version 1.96 ------Sequential Output------ --Sequential Input- --Random-
Concurrency 1 -Per Chr- --Block-- -Rewrite- -Per Chr- --Block-- --Seeks--
Machine Size K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP /sec %CP
localhost.loc 2000M 74 99 39432 12 27308 10 836 99 65104 9 351.5 11
Latency 179ms 1207ms 429ms 109ms 109ms 215ms
Version 1.96 ------Sequential Create------ --------Random Create--------
localhost.localdoma -Create-- --Read--- -Delete-- -Create-- --Read--- -Delete--
files /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP
16 23991 81 +++++ +++ +++++ +++ 17007 57 +++++ +++ +++++ +++
Latency 1276us 1189us 787us 1183us 438us 2813us
--
Jiann-Ming Su
"I have to decide between two equally frightening options.
If I wanted to do that, I'd vote." --Duckman
"The system's broke, Hank. The election baby has peed in
the bath water. You got to throw 'em both out." --Dale Gribble
"Those who vote decide nothing.
Those who count the votes decide everything.” --Joseph Stalin
More information about the Gluster-users
mailing list