[Gluster-users] Performance and redundancy help
Chad
ccolumbu at hotmail.com
Wed Feb 24 17:35:31 UTC 2010
Ok, I tried to change over to this, but now I just get:
[2010-02-24 09:30:41] E [authenticate.c:234:gf_authenticate] auth: no authentication module is interested in accepting remote-client 10.0.0.24:1007
[2010-02-24 09:30:41] E [server-protocol.c:5822:mop_setvolume] tcb_remote: Cannot authenticate client from 10.0.0.24:1007
I am sure it is something simple, I just don't know what.
Is this a port problem? the port in the log is 1007, but the server is on 50001.
Here are my config files:
----- server.vol: -----
volume tcb_posix-export
type storage/posix
option directory /mnt/tcb_data
end-volume
volume tcb_locks-export
type features/locks
subvolumes tcb_posix-export
end-volume
volume tcb_export
type performance/io-threads
option thread-count 8
subvolumes tcb_locks-export
end-volume
volume tcb_remote
type protocol/server
option transport-type tcp
option transport.socket.listen-port 50001
option transport.socket.nodelay on
subvolumes tcb_export tcb_locks-export
option auth.ip.tcb_locks-export.allow 10.0.0.*,10.0.20.*,10.0.30.*,192.168.1.*,192.168.20.*,192.168.30.*,127.0.0.1
option auth.ip.tcb_export.allow 10.0.0.*,10.0.20.*,10.0.30.*,192.168.1.*,192.168.20.*,192.168.30.*,127.0.0.1
end-volume
----- client.vol -----
volume tcb_remote1
type protocol/client
option transport-type tcp
option remote-port 50001
option remote-host 10.0.0.24
option remote-subvolume tcb_remote
end-volume
volume tcb_remote2
type protocol/client
option transport-type tcp
option remote-port 50001
option remote-host 10.0.0.25
option remote-subvolume tcb_remote
end-volume
volume tcb_mirror
type cluster/afr
subvolumes tcb_remote1 tcb_remote2
end-volume
volume tcb_wb
type performance/write-behind
option cache-size 1MB
subvolumes tcb_mirror
end-volume
volume tcb_ioc
type performance/io-cache
option cache-size 32MB
subvolumes tcb_wb
end-volume
volume tcb_iothreads
type performance/io-threads
option thread-count 16
subvolumes tcb_ioc
end-volume
^C
Chad wrote:
> I finally got the servers transported 2000 miles, set-up, wired, and
> booted.
> Here are the vol files.
> Just to reiterate, the issues are slow performance on read/write, and
> clients hanging when 1 server goes down.
>
>
> ### glusterfs.vol ###
> ############################################
> # Start tcb_cluster
> ############################################
> # the exported volume to mount # required!
> volume tcb_cluster
> type protocol/client
> option transport-type tcp/client
> option remote-host glustcluster
> option remote-port 50001
> option remote-subvolume tcb_cluster
> end-volume
>
> ############################################
> # Start cs_cluster
> ############################################
> # the exported volume to mount # required!
> volume cs_cluster
> type protocol/client
> option transport-type tcp/client
> option remote-host glustcluster
> option remote-port 50002
> option remote-subvolume cs_cluster
> end-volume
>
> ############################################
> # Start pbx_cluster
> ############################################
> # the exported volume to mount # required!
> volume pbx_cluster
> type protocol/client
> option transport-type tcp/client
> option remote-host glustcluster
> option remote-port 50003
> option remote-subvolume pbx_cluster
> end-volume
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------
> ### glusterfsd.vol ###
> #############################################
> # Start tcb_data cluster
> #############################################
> volume tcb_local
> type storage/posix
> option directory /mnt/tcb_data
> end-volume
>
> volume tcb_locks
> type features/locks
> option mandatory-locks on # enables mandatory locking
> on all files
> subvolumes tcb_local
> end-volume
>
> # dataspace on remote machine, look in /etc/hosts to see that
> volume tcb_locks_remote
> type protocol/client
> option transport-type tcp
> option remote-port 50001
> option remote-host 192.168.1.25
> option remote-subvolume tcb_locks
> end-volume
>
> # automatic file replication translator for dataspace
> volume tcb_cluster_afr
> type cluster/replicate
> subvolumes tcb_locks tcb_locks_remote
> end-volume
>
> # the actual exported volume
> volume tcb_cluster
> type performance/io-threads
> option thread-count 256
> option cache-size 128MB
> subvolumes tcb_cluster_afr
> end-volume
>
> volume tcb_cluster_server
> type protocol/server
> option transport-type tcp
> option transport.socket.listen-port 50001
> option auth.addr.tcb_locks.allow *
> option auth.addr.tcb_cluster.allow *
> option transport.socket.nodelay on
> subvolumes tcb_cluster
> end-volume
>
> #############################################
> # Start cs_data cluster
> #############################################
> volume cs_local
> type storage/posix
> option directory /mnt/cs_data
> end-volume
>
> volume cs_locks
> type features/locks
> option mandatory-locks on # enables mandatory locking
> on all files
> subvolumes cs_local
> end-volume
>
> # dataspace on remote machine, look in /etc/hosts to see that
> volume cs_locks_remote
> type protocol/client
> option transport-type tcp
> option remote-port 50002
> option remote-host 192.168.1.25
> option remote-subvolume cs_locks
> end-volume
>
> # automatic file replication translator for dataspace
> volume cs_cluster_afr
> type cluster/replicate
> subvolumes cs_locks cs_locks_remote
> end-volume
>
> # the actual exported volume
> volume cs_cluster
> type performance/io-threads
> option thread-count 256
> option cache-size 128MB
> subvolumes cs_cluster_afr
> end-volume
>
> volume cs_cluster_server
> type protocol/server
> option transport-type tcp
> option transport.socket.listen-port 50002
> option auth.addr.cs_locks.allow *
> option auth.addr.cs_cluster.allow *
> option transport.socket.nodelay on
> subvolumes cs_cluster
> end-volume
>
> #############################################
> # Start pbx_data cluster
> #############################################
> volume pbx_local
> type storage/posix
> option directory /mnt/pbx_data
> end-volume
>
> volume pbx_locks
> type features/locks
> option mandatory-locks on # enables mandatory locking
> on all files
> subvolumes pbx_local
> end-volume
>
> # dataspace on remote machine, look in /etc/hosts to see that
> volume pbx_locks_remote
> type protocol/client
> option transport-type tcp
> option remote-port 50003
> option remote-host 192.168.1.25
> option remote-subvolume pbx_locks
> end-volume
>
> # automatic file replication translator for dataspace
> volume pbx_cluster_afr
> type cluster/replicate
> subvolumes pbx_locks pbx_locks_remote
> end-volume
>
> # the actual exported volume
> volume pbx_cluster
> type performance/io-threads
> option thread-count 256
> option cache-size 128MB
> subvolumes pbx_cluster_afr
> end-volume
>
> volume pbx_cluster_server
> type protocol/server
> option transport-type tcp
> option transport.socket.listen-port 50003
> option auth.addr.pbx_locks.allow *
> option auth.addr.pbx_cluster.allow *
> option transport.socket.nodelay on
> subvolumes pbx_cluster
> end-volume
>
>
> --
> ^C
>
>
>
> Smart Weblications GmbH - Florian Wiessner wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Am 16.02.2010 01:58, schrieb Chad:
>>> I am new to glusterfs, and this list, please let me know if I have made
>>> any mistakes in posting this to the list.
>>> I am not sure what your standards are.
>>>
>>> I came across glusterfs last week, it was super easy to set-up and test
>>> and is almost exactly what I want/need.
>>> I set up 2 "glusterfs servers" that serve up a mirrored raid5 disk
>>> partitioned into 3 5oogb partitions to 6 clients.
>>> I am using round robin DNS, but I also tried to use heartbeat and
>>> ldirectord (see details below).
>>> Each server has 2 NICs: 1 for the clients, the other has a cross over
>>> cable connecting the 2 servers. Both NICs are 1000mbps.
>>>
>>> There are only 2 issues.
>>> #1. When one of the servers goes down the clients hang at least for a
>>> little while (more testing is needed) I am not sure if the clients can
>>> recover at all.
>>> #2. The read/write tests I performed came in at 1.6 when using
>>> glusterfs, NFS on all the same machines came in at 11, and a direct test
>>> on the data server came
>>> in at 111. How do I improve the performance?
>>>
>>
>> please share your vol-files. i don't understand why you would need
>> loadbalancers.
>>
>>> ###############################################
>>> My glusterfs set-up:
>>> 2 supermicro dual Xeon 3.0 ghz CPUs, 8gb ram, 4 @ 750gb seagate sata
>>> HDs, 3 in raid5 with 1 hot spare. (data servers)
>>
>> why not use raid10? same capacity, better speed..
>>
>>> 6 supermicro dual AMD 2.8 ghz CPUs, 4gb ram, 2 @ 250gb seagate sata HDs
>>> in raid 1. (client machines)
>>> glusterfs is set-up with round robin DNS to handle the load balancing of
>>> the 2 data servers.
>>
>> afaik there is no need to setup dns rr nor loadbalancing for the gluster
>> servers, glusterfs should take care of that itself. but without your
>> volfiles i
>> can't give any hints.
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-users mailing list
> Gluster-users at gluster.org
> http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>
>
More information about the Gluster-users
mailing list