[Gluster-users] Rsync
Hiren Joshi
josh at moonfruit.com
Mon Oct 5 15:49:53 UTC 2009
My users are more pitch fork less shooting.....
I don't understand what you're saying, should I have locally copied all
the files over not using gluster before attempting an rsync?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stephan von Krawczynski [mailto:skraw at ithnet.com]
> Sent: 05 October 2009 14:13
> To: Hiren Joshi
> Cc: Pavan Vilas Sondur; gluster-users at gluster.org
> Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] Rsync
>
> It would be nice to remember my thread about _not_ copying
> data initially to
> gluster via the mountpoint. And one major reason for _local_
> feed was: speed.
> Obviously a lot of cases are merely impossible because of the
> pure waiting
> time. If you had a live setup people would have already shot you...
> This is why I talked about a feature and not an accepted bug
> behaviour.
>
> Regards,
> Stephan
>
>
> On Mon, 5 Oct 2009 11:00:36 +0100
> "Hiren Joshi" <josh at moonfruit.com> wrote:
>
> > Just a quick update: The rsync is *still* not finished.
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: gluster-users-bounces at gluster.org
> > > [mailto:gluster-users-bounces at gluster.org] On Behalf Of
> Hiren Joshi
> > > Sent: 01 October 2009 16:50
> > > To: Pavan Vilas Sondur
> > > Cc: gluster-users at gluster.org
> > > Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] Rsync
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > >
> > > I'm keeping a close eye on the "is glusterfs DHT really
> distributed?"
> > > thread =)
> > >
> > > I tried nodelay on and unhashd no. I tarred about 400G to
> the share in
> > > about 17 hours (~6MB/s?) and am running an rsync now.
> Will post the
> > > results when it's done.
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Pavan Vilas Sondur [mailto:pavan at gluster.com]
> > > > Sent: 01 October 2009 09:00
> > > > To: Hiren Joshi
> > > > Cc: gluster-users at gluster.org
> > > > Subject: Re: Rsync
> > > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > > We're looking into the problem on similar setups and
> workng on it.
> > > > Meanwhile can you let us know if performance increases if you
> > > > use this option:
> > > >
> > > > option transport.socket.nodelay on' in each of your
> > > > protocol/client and protocol/server volumes.
> > > >
> > > > Pavan
> > > >
> > > > On 28/09/09 11:25 +0100, Hiren Joshi wrote:
> > > > > Another update:
> > > > > It took 1240 minutes (over 20 hours) to complete on
> the simplified
> > > > > system (without mirroring). What else can I do to debug?
> > > > >
> > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > From: gluster-users-bounces at gluster.org
> > > > > > [mailto:gluster-users-bounces at gluster.org] On Behalf Of
> > > > Hiren Joshi
> > > > > > Sent: 24 September 2009 13:05
> > > > > > To: Pavan Vilas Sondur
> > > > > > Cc: gluster-users at gluster.org
> > > > > > Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] Rsync
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > > From: Pavan Vilas Sondur [mailto:pavan at gluster.com]
> > > > > > > Sent: 24 September 2009 12:42
> > > > > > > To: Hiren Joshi
> > > > > > > Cc: gluster-users at gluster.org
> > > > > > > Subject: Re: Rsync
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Can you let us know the following:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > * What is the exact directory structure?
> > > > > > /abc/def/ghi/jkl/[1-4]
> > > > > > now abc, def, ghi and jkl are one of a thousand dirs.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > * How many files are there in each individual
> directory and
> > > > > > > of what size?
> > > > > > Each of the [1-4] dirs has about 100 files in, all
> under 1MB.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > * It looks like each server process has 6 export
> > > > > > > directories. Can you run one server process each
> for a single
> > > > > > > export directory and check if the rsync speeds up?
> > > > > > I had no idea you could do that. How? Would I need to
> > > > create 6 config
> > > > > > files and start gluster:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > /usr/sbin/glusterfsd -f /etc/glusterfs/export1.vol
> or similar?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I'll give this a go....
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > * Also, do you have any benchmarks with a
> similar setup on
> > > > > > say, NFS?
> > > > > > NFS will create the dir tree in about 20 minutes then start
> > > > > > copying the
> > > > > > files over, it takes about 2-3 hours.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Pavan
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On 24/09/09 12:13 +0100, Hiren Joshi wrote:
> > > > > > > > It's been running for over 24 hours now.
> > > > > > > > Network traffic is nominal, top shows about
> 200-400% cpu
> > > > > > (7 cores so
> > > > > > > > it's not too bad).
> > > > > > > > About 14G of memory used (the rest is being used as
> > > > disk cache).
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Thoughts?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > <snip>
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > An update, after running the rsync for a day,
> > > > I killed it
> > > > > > > > > > > and remounted
> > > > > > > > > > > > all the disks (the underlying
> filesystem, not the
> > > > > > gluster)
> > > > > > > > > > > with noatime,
> > > > > > > > > > > > the rsync completed in about 600
> minutes. I'm now
> > > > > > going to
> > > > > > > > > > > try one level
> > > > > > > > > > > > up (about 1,000,000,000 dirs).
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > > > > > > > > From: Pavan Vilas Sondur
> > > [mailto:pavan at gluster.com]
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Sent: 23 September 2009 07:55
> > > > > > > > > > > > > To: Hiren Joshi
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Cc: gluster-users at gluster.org
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Subject: Re: Rsync
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Hiren,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > What glusterfs version are you using? Can you
> > > > > > send us the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > volfiles and the log files.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Pavan
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > On 22/09/09 16:01 +0100, Hiren Joshi wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > I forgot to mention, the mount is
> mounted with
> > > > > > > > > > > direct-io, would this
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > make a difference?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > From: gluster-users-bounces at gluster.org
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> [mailto:gluster-users-bounces at gluster.org] On
> > > > > > > Behalf Of
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Hiren Joshi
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sent: 22 September 2009 11:40
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To: gluster-users at gluster.org
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Subject: [Gluster-users] Rsync
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hello all,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm getting what I think is bizarre
> > > > > > > behaviour.... I have
> > > > > > > > > > > > > about 400G to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > rsync (rsync -av) onto a gluster share,
> > > > the data is
> > > > > > > > > > > in a directory
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > structure which has about 1000
> directories
> > > > > > > per parent and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > about 1000
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > directories in each of them.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > When I try to rsync an end leaf
> > > directory (this
> > > > > > > > > has about 4
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > dirs and 100
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > files in each) the operation
> takes about 10
> > > > > > > > > seconds. When I
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > go one level
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > above (1000 dirs with about 4
> dirs in each
> > > > > > > with about 100
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > files in each)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the operation takes about 10 minutes.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Now, if I then go one level above that
> > > > (that's 1000
> > > > > > > > > > dirs with
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1000 dirs
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > in each with about 4 dirs in each
> with about
> > > > > > > 100 files in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > each) the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > operation takes days! Top shows
> glusterfsd
> > > > > > > takes 300-600%
> > > > > > > > > > > > > cpu usage
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (2X4core), I have about 48G of memory
> > > > > > (usage is 0% as
> > > > > > > > > > > expected).
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Has anyone seen anything like
> this? How can I
> > > > > > > speed it up?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Josh.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Gluster-users mailing list
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Gluster-users at gluster.org
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > > > > Gluster-users mailing list
> > > > > > > > > > Gluster-users at gluster.org
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > Gluster-users mailing list
> > > > > > Gluster-users at gluster.org
> > > > > > http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Gluster-users mailing list
> > > Gluster-users at gluster.org
> > > http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Gluster-users mailing list
> > Gluster-users at gluster.org
> > http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
> >
>
>
More information about the Gluster-users
mailing list