[Gluster-users] Real interesting
josh at moonfruit.com
Mon Oct 5 13:38:29 UTC 2009
It has to be said, though I'm suffering from major performance issues,
I've found glusterfs to be stable and reliable. Perhaps a list of
recommended hardware to run it on would be a good thing.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: gluster-users-bounces at gluster.org
> [mailto:gluster-users-bounces at gluster.org] On Behalf Of Vijay Bellur
> Sent: 05 October 2009 14:36
> To: Barry Jaspan
> Cc: gluster-users at gluster.org
> Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] Real interesting
> Barry Jaspan wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 8:34 AM, Vijay Bellur
> <vijay at gluster.com> wrote:
> >>>> Hello list .
> >>> I was just wondering if there is someone on this list that
> >>> was able to run gluster servers (4 servers) for a complete 1 week
> >>> without having 1 glusterfsd server crash for no good resone
> >> Can you please share the configuration and workload that
> you are using? We
> >> have several servers that run for days without a problem.
> > Ummm.... "days"? Please tell me this is not the maximum extent of
> > reliability we can expect from glusterfs.
> It was with respect to the message from the OP. We have
> several internal
> glusterfs shares that have been working for months without a
> problem :-)
> Gluster-users mailing list
> Gluster-users at gluster.org
More information about the Gluster-users