[Gluster-users] Improving afr performance
Paras Fadte
plfgoa at gmail.com
Fri Nov 20 06:35:14 UTC 2009
Hi Vikas,
Thanks for the response.
I am having performance issues upon migration to gluster. Follwoing
should explain the issue.
There are scripts running which access data from the gluster mount
point . Earlier NFS was used . With NFS the scripts seem to have no
problem getting completed faster but when same scripts run accessing
same data from gluster it runs about 3-4 times slower . Mostly the
scripts do stat/unlinking/renaming operations on files. Number of
files would be roughly 25k withe average file size 40KB . What can be
done to increase the speed/performance ?
Regarding stat-prefetch is the following usage correct ?
volume afr
type cluster/replicate
subvolumes A B
end-volume
volume stat-prefetch
type performance/stat-prefetch
subvolumes afr
end-volume
Thank you.
-Paras
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 1:42 AM, Vikas Gorur <vikas at gluster.com> wrote:
> Paras Fadte wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Which settings in AFR in gluster directly affects performance when
>> there are lots of "ls" and "stat" calls made on files mounted using
>> gluster?
>>
>>
>
> There isn't any setting in afr that can affect ls or stat performance. You
> can load
> the stat-prefetch translator above afr to increase ls/stat performance.
>
> Vikas
>
>
More information about the Gluster-users
mailing list