[Gluster-users] Unify versus distribute, 2.0rc1

[Raghavendra G]

Hi,

I am not personally aware of the configuration where unify broke down as per
the criteria you've mentioned. We would be interested to know of the
configuration where unify broke down.

regards,

On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 5:13 PM, Sean Davis <sdavis2 at mail.nih.gov> wrote:

>
>
> On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 1:09 AM, Raghavendra G <raghavendra at zresearch.com>wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> The main difference would be the absence of namespace in distribute. Hence
>> distribute has better scalability than unify.
>>
>
> That makes sense.  Just out of curiosity, has anyone looked at where unify
> begins to break down compared to Distribute in terms of number of files,
> concurrency, etc.?  It is likely that this question is too vague for an
> answer, but I thought I would ask.
>
> Thanks, again, Raghavendra.
>
> Sean
>
>
>
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 3:00 AM, Sean Davis <sdavis2 at mail.nih.gov> wrote:
>>
>>> Sorry if I missed something important, but what is the difference between
>>> unify and distribute in 2.0rc1?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Sean
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Gluster-users mailing list
>>> Gluster-users at gluster.org
>>> http://zresearch.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Raghavendra G
>>
>>
>


-- 
Raghavendra G
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://supercolony.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20090127/846d7578/attachment.html>