[Gluster-users] Replication does not replicate the reference node on crash

[Paras Fadte]

Is this known issue fixed in Gluster3.0 ?

On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 5:38 PM, Paras Fadte <plfgoa at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Vikas,
>
> Will this issue be addressed in immediate future ?
>
> Thank you.
>
> -Paras
>
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 1:27 PM, Vikas Gorur <vikas at gluster.com> wrote:
> > joel vennin wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi ! I'm continuing to test glusterfs,
> >>
> >> I've a strange problem us replication in fact. My setup is prety easy,
> >> i've
> >> 3 nodes, and I want to make replication through this 3 nodes
> >>
> >> Basic configuration:
> >>
> >> volume mega-replicator
> >>       type       cluster/replicate
> >>       subvolumes zbrick1 zbrick2 zbrick3
> >> end-volume
> >>
> >> The scenario:
> >>
> >> 1) I copy data to the gluster mount point: -> Data is copied on the 3
> >> nodes
> >> [OK]
> >> 2) I kill zbrick2 glusterfs, I erase data on zbrick2, I remount
> glusterfs
> >> mount point, do a ls -Rl on the mount point, data is replicated to
> zbrick2
> >> [OK]
> >> 3) I do exactly the same thing with zbrick1, when I mount again the
> >> zbrick1,
> >> I do a ls -Rl on the mount point and there is nothing, the directory is
> >> empty.
> >>    So I do a ls -Rl on the zbrick2 and on zbrick3, and I get the same
> >> result, nothing on the mount point.
> >>    Why ?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> > This is a known issue for now:
> >
> http://gluster.com/community/documentation/index.php/Understanding_AFR_Translator#Self-heal_of_a_file_that_does_not_exist_on_the_first_subvolume
> >
> > Vikas
> > _______________________________________________
> > Gluster-users mailing list
> > Gluster-users at gluster.org
> > http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
> >
>