[Gluster-users] Performance

Liam Slusser lslusser at gmail.com
Wed Aug 12 17:28:41 UTC 2009

On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 10:24 AM, Hiren Joshi <josh at moonfruit.com> wrote:

> We went with 36 partitions (on a single raid 6 drive) incase we got file
> system corruption, it would take less time to fsck a 100G partition than
> a 3.6TB one. Would a 3.6TB single disk be better?

Have you looked at using XFS for a filesystem?  Its a journaling filesystem
and should almost require no rebuild/check in a crash.


More information about the Gluster-users mailing list