[Gluster-users] glusterfs performance

Anand Avati avati at zresearch.com
Fri Sep 19 19:51:26 UTC 2008

> Alright, just a sec, as I'm running another benchmark with write-back's
> aggregate-size set to 4MB (which seems to be the maximum)... Alright,
> that made a bit of an improvement, but it's still slower than 1.3.10
> with aggregate-size set to 1MB on the server side, and also still a
> *lot* slower than the write speeds of the systems involved (~70MB/sec on
> server1, ~35MB/sec on server2):

Please load write-behind and read-ahead on top of AFR (just one instances of
each perf xlator). write-behind with  high aggregate-size is effective when
used on top of AFR. Currently there is some code cleanup happening in AFR in
1.4, so please await the next pre-release to use AFR.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://supercolony.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20080920/033dce7e/attachment.html>

More information about the Gluster-users mailing list