[Gluster-users] Directory writes yes, directory reads no

[Amar S. Tumballi]

>
> 2008-06-12 16:38:48 D [fuse-bridge.c:1931:fuse_readdir] glusterfs-fuse: 0:
> READDIR (0x80139e0e0, size=4096, offset=0)
> 2008-06-12 16:38:48 D [fuse-bridge.c:1899:fuse_readdir_cbk] glusterfs-fuse:
> 0: READDIR => 568/4096,0
> 2008-06-12 16:38:48 D [fuse-bridge.c:1931:fuse_readdir] glusterfs-fuse: 0:
> READDIR (0x80139e0e0, size=4096, offset=0)
> 2008-06-12 16:38:48 D [fuse-bridge.c:1899:fuse_readdir_cbk] glusterfs-fuse:
> 0: READDIR => 568/4096,0
>

If you look at the above lines, it is returning 568 bytes (mostly 4-8
entries) for that directory. I am suspecting something wrong about how the
things are interpreted in BSD fuse. But today I got a report on IRC that,
things work on one machine, and the same setup, doesn't work on another
machine. Interested to solve it. Is these 64bit machine? or 32bit?



> --
> Scott Larson
> Network Administrator
>
> Wiredrive
> 4216 3/4 Glencoe Ave
> Marina Del Rey, CA 90292
> t 310.823.8238
> stl at wiredrive.com <stl at iowainteractive.com>
> http://www.wiredrive.com
>
> On Jun 3, 2008, at 1:25 AM, KE Liew wrote:
>
> It would be useful to know which version you're using, and what your setup
> is. Posting your spec file and logs can help too.
>
>
> KwangErn
>
> On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 1:17 AM, Scott Larson <stl at wiredrive.com> wrote:
>
>>     The quick question:  Has anyone else run into the issue where
>> they can write files to a directory, but then are unable to see them
>> with something like `ls`?  After starting the server and client and
>> mounting the glusterfs share to /mnt/gluster, if I cd into it and run
>> `touch foo && ls`, no files are visible.  However if I then look at
>> the actual directory being shared, /usr/export, file foo is present.
>> This problem seems counterintuitive.  I can provide logs and the
>> config if there isn't an obvious answer, however nothing in the logs
>> immediately grabs me.
>>     As a background, I'm looking at alternatives to our Isilon
>> cluster, and all of our client servers are FreeBSD 7.0.  I know that
>> is not currently a supported client OS, however GlusterFS would be a
>> seemingly good candidate for our needs and the fact writes actually
>> work is promising.
>>
>> --
>> Scott Larson
>> Network Administrator
>> IOWA Interactive
>> 4216 3/4 Glencoe Ave
>> Marina Del Rey, CA 90292
>>
>> t 310.823.8238
>> f 310.823.7108
>> stl at iowainteractive.com
>> http://www.iowainteractive.com
>> http://www.wiredrive.com
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Gluster-users mailing list
>> Gluster-users at gluster.org
>> http://zresearch.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-users mailing list
> Gluster-users at gluster.org
> http://zresearch.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>
>


-- 
Amar Tumballi
Gluster/GlusterFS Hacker
[bulde on #gluster/irc.gnu.org]
http://www.zresearch.com - Commoditizing Super Storage!
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://supercolony.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20080612/0d440d7d/attachment.html>