[Gluster-users] Why so bad performance?
Kirby Zhou
kirbyzhou at sohu-rd.com
Sun Dec 7 15:00:53 UTC 2008
Are you sure?
I have tried, but nothing changes
[@123.25 ~]# rmmod fuse
[@123.25 ~]# yum install fuse-2.7.3-1.el5.rf dkms-fuse-2.7.3-1.nodist.rf
glusterfs
[@123.25 ~]# dd if=/opt/xxx of=/mnt/xxx4 bs=16M
16+0 records in
16+0 records out
268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 25.4561 seconds, 10.5 MB/s
[@123.25 ~]# modinfo fuse
filename: /lib/modules/2.6.18-92.el5/extra/fuse.ko
alias: char-major-10-229
license: GPL
description: Filesystem in Userspace
author: Miklos Szeredi <miklos at szeredi.hu>
srcversion: BA591606954B6B1F7AA2660
depends:
vermagic: 2.6.18-92.el5 SMP mod_unload gcc-4.1
@123.25 ~]# ll /lib/modules/2.6.18-92.el5/extra/fuse.ko
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 101384 Dec 7 22:55
/lib/modules/2.6.18-92.el5/extra/fuse.ko
-----Original Message-----
From: anand.avati at gmail.com [mailto:anand.avati at gmail.com] On Behalf Of
Anand Avati
Sent: Sunday, December 07, 2008 3:02 AM
To: Kirby Zhou
Cc: gluster-users at gluster.org
Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] Why so bad performance?
> fuse.x86_64-2.7.4-1.el5.rf from
dag.wieers.com
> dkms-fuse.noarch-2.7.4-1.nodist.rf from dag.wieers.com
Can you try with a different fuse version (kernel module included)?
There have been reports about 2.7.4 performing badly for writes in
certain kernel versions. Can you try 2.7.3 ?
thanks,
avati
More information about the Gluster-users
mailing list