[Gluster-users] Unable to create new files or folders using samba and vfs_glusterfs

[lejeczek]

On 15/12/2018 13:46, Diego Remolina wrote:
> Matt,
>
> Can you test the updated samba packages that the CentOS
> team has built for FasTrack?
>
> A NOTE has been added to this issue.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
>  (0033351) pgreco (developer) - 2018-12-15 13:43
>  https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=15586#c33351 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
> @dijuremo at gmail.com <mailto:dijuremo at gmail.com>
> Here's the link for the test build
> https://buildlogs.centos.org/c7-fasttrack.x86_64/samba/20181214164659/4.8.3-4.el7.0.1.x86_64/
> .
> Please let us know how it goes. Thanks for testing!
> Pablo.
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Diego
>
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 12:52 AM Anoop C S
> <anoopcs at cryptolab.net <mailto:anoopcs at cryptolab.net>> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 2018-12-13 at 15:31 +0000, Matt Waymack wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I’m having an issue on Windows clients accessing
> shares via smb when
> > > using vfs_glusterfs.  They are unable to create any
> file or folders
> > > at the root of the share and get the error “The file
> is too large for
> > > the destination file system.”  When I change from
> vfs_glusterfs to
> > > just using a filesystem path to the same location, it
> works fine
> > > (except for the performance hit).  All my searches
> have led to bug
> > > 1619108, and that seems to be the symptom, but there
> doesn’t appear
> > > to be any clear resolution.
> >
> > You figured out the right bug and following is the
> upstream Samba bug:
> >
> > https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13585
> >
> > Unfortunately it is only available with v4.8.6 and
> higher. If required
> > I can patch it up and provide a build.
> >
> > > I’m on the latest version of samba available on CentOS
> 7 (4.8.3) and
> > > I’m on the latest available glusterfs 4.1 (4.1.6).  Is
> there
> > > something simple I’m missing to get this going?
> > >
> > > Thank you!
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Gluster-users mailing list
> > > Gluster-users at gluster.org
> <mailto:Gluster-users at gluster.org>
> > > https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Gluster-users mailing list
> > Gluster-users at gluster.org <mailto:Gluster-users at gluster.org>
> > https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-users mailing list
> Gluster-users at gluster.org
> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users

I see either reintroduction if the same bug or something
very similar in:

samba-4.10.4-10.el7.x86_64
glusterfs-server-6.9-1.el7.x86_64

Disaster strikes again! Fcuking hell.

Not being a developer I think the code from patches to <4.10 versions are now in the upstream(or Centos') trunk(certainly are not in patches).

So now, after yesterday's update to Centos 7.8, samba+gluster render the same old:

"The file '<%1 NULL:NameDest>' is too large for the destination file system.'

Not good... very, very bad.

regards, L