[Gluster-users] [Gluster-devel] Modifying gluster's logging mechanism

Xie Changlong zgrep at 139.com
Fri Nov 22 09:54:42 UTC 2019


在 2019/11/22 17:43, Barak Sason Rofman 写道:
> Thank you for your input Atin and Xie Changlong.
>
> Regarding log ordering - my initial thought was to do it offline using 
> a dedicated too. Should be straight forward, as the logs have time 
> stamp composed of seconds and microseconds, so ordering them using 
> this value is definitely possible.
> This is actually one of the main reasons I wanted to bring this up for 
> discussion - will it be fine with the community to run a dedicated 
> tool to reorder the logs offline?
> Reordering the logs offline will allow us to gain the most performance 
> improvement, as keeping the logs order online will have some cost 
> (probably through stronger synchronization).
> Moreover, we can take log viewing one step further and maybe create 
> some GUI system (JAVA based?) to view and handle logs (e.g. one window 
> to show the combined order logs, other windows to show logs per thread 
> etc').
>
> Regarding the test method - my initial testing was done by removing 
> all logging from regression. Modifying the method "skip_logging" to 
> return 'true' in all cases seems to remove most of the logs (though 
> not all, "to be on the safe side", really removing all logging related 
> methods is probably even better).


Thanks for sharing, i'll go back to your method and do some perf test : )


> As regression tests use mostly single-node tests, some additional 
> testing was needed. I've written a couple of very basic scripts to 
> create large number of files / big files, read / write to / from them, 
> move them around and perform some other basic functionality.
> I'd actually be glad to test this in some 'real world' use cases - if 
> you have specific use cases that you use frequently, we can model them 
> and benchmark against - this will likely offer an even more accurate 
> benchmark.
>
> On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 7:27 AM Xie Changlong <zgrep at 139.com 
> <mailto:zgrep at 139.com>> wrote:
>
>
>     在 2019/11/21 21:04, Barak Sason Rofman 写道:
>>
>>     I see two design / implementation problems with that mechanism:
>>
>>     1.
>>
>>         The mutex that guards the log file is likely under constant
>>         contention.
>>
>>     2.
>>
>>         The fact that each worker thread perform the IO by himself,
>>         thus slowing his "real" work.
>>
>>
>>     Initial tests, done by *removing logging from the regression
>>     testing, shows an improvement of about 20% in run time*. This
>>     indicates we’re taking a pretty heavy performance hit just
>>     because of the logging activity.
>>
>>
>     Hi Barak Sason Rofman.  Amazing perf improvement! Could show me
>     the detail test method ?
>
>     Thanks
>
>         -Xie
>
>>     In addition to these problems, the logging module is due for an
>>     upgrade:
>>
>>     1.
>>
>>         There are dozens of APIs in the logger, much of them are
>>         deprecated - this makes it very hard for new developers to
>>         keep evolving the project.
>>
>>     2.
>>
>>         One of the key points for Gluster-X, presented in October at
>>         Bangalore, is the switch to a structured logging all across
>>         gluster.
>>
>
>
> -- 
> *Barak Sason Rofman*
>
> Gluster Storage Development
>
> Red Hat Israel <https://www.redhat.com/>
>
> 34 Jerusalem rd. Ra'anana, 43501
>
> bsasonro at redhat.com <mailto:adi at redhat.com>  T: _+972-9-7692304_
> M: _+972-52-4326355_
>
> <https://red.ht/sig>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20191122/6bc92281/attachment.html>


More information about the Gluster-users mailing list